The California Supreme Court “agreed to decide whether the tolling of the statute of limitations for a malpractice action against a law firm continues after the responsible lawyer leaves the firm if he or she continues to represent the client.”
“The Court of Appeal for this district, Div. Two, answered that question in the affirmative on Jan. 10 in Beal Bank, SSB v. Arter & Hadden, LLP, reversing a contrary ruling by Los Angeles Superior Court Judge John P. Shook. Div.” The blog blurb came from Met News.Com details.