By Andrew Lavoott Bluestone on Posted in Legal Malpractice Basics,UncategorizedYour attorney negligently steered you into bankruptcy? It could be a good cause of action in legal malpractice. A few technicalities, however. Do you still have standing to sue the attorney? Likely not. In Burbacki v Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara & Wolf, LLP 2019 NY Slip Op 04128 Decided on May 29, 2019 the Appellate… Continue Reading
By Andrew Lavoott Bluestone on Posted in Legal Malpractice BasicsThe City of New York waited too long to try to amend its third-party complaint. The Court found that the City knew all the facts upon which the new complaint might be based and after 26 depositions or so, its just too late. Commodore Constr. Corp. v City of New York 2019 NY Slip Op 31316(U) May… Continue Reading
By Andrew Lavoott Bluestone on Posted in Legal Malpractice BasicsIn Pugliese v Martin Law Group, P.C. 2019 NY Slip Op 01810 Decided on March 13, 2019 the Appellate Division, Second Department reminds that legal malpractice consists of more than a mere mistake. Plaintiff must still prove proximate or “but for” cause. Merely failing to perfect an appeal is insufficient. “ORDERED that the order is modified, on the… Continue Reading
By Andrew Lavoott Bluestone on Posted in Legal Malpractice BasicsAttorneys are expected zealously to represent clients, all within the cannons of ethics, of course. However, “that wasn’t my job” or “I wasn’t retained to do that” is a frequent defense in legal malpractice cases. Exeter Law Group LLP v Immortalana Inc. 2018 NY Slip Op 01269 [158 AD3d 576] February 22, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department spends little… Continue Reading
By Andrew Lavoott Bluestone on Posted in Legal Malpractice BasicsThe Second Department gives a black-letter lecture on the common interest privilege, in a legal malpractice setting. Saint Annes Dev. Co. v Russ 2018 NY Slip Op 00451 [157 AD3d 919] January 24, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department holds that: “The common-interest privilege is an exception to the traditional rule that the presence of a third party waives… Continue Reading
By Andrew Lavoott Bluestone on Posted in Legal Malpractice BasicsBoard of Mgrs. of Manhattan Place Condominium v 616 First Ave., LLC 2019 NY Slip Op 30216(U) January 25, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652240/17 Judge: Frank P. Nervo is an excellent primer on the law of contribution and indemnity. In this property construction setting, there is none available. “The underlying action herein concerns a building… Continue Reading
By Andrew Lavoott Bluestone on Posted in Legal Malpractice Basics,UncategorizedClark v Allen & Overy LLP 2019 NY Slip Op 30146(U) January 16, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 453138/2017 Judge: Arlene P. Bluth is an employment abuse case (between lawyers) that went all the way to a request for cert at SCOTUS. For our purposes, it’s not a JL § 487 case. Even more interesting, there is no… Continue Reading
By Andrew Lavoott Bluestone on Posted in Legal Malpractice BasicsA slight exaggeration, but in 195 Hawthorne Partners, LLC. v Thompson 2018 NY Slip Op 32804(U) October 30, 2018 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 506136/18 Judge: Leon Ruchelsman there are pages and pages of discussion of a back-and-forth transfer, deeds, mortgages, foreclosures of what must be a valuable property. The attorneys are third-partied and claims for malpractice and violation… Continue Reading
By Andrew Lavoott Bluestone on Posted in Legal Malpractice BasicsWe’re proud to announce that our “It’s Over, Now What” can be found in today’s NYLJ. From the article: “The attorney-client relationship has a limited lifespan. Generally, it is a project-based temporary business relationship, albeit a fiduciary one. Whether the representation is short or long, transactional or litigation based, it must someday end. It may… Continue Reading
By Andrew Lavoott Bluestone on Posted in Legal Malpractice BasicsHow often is it that a judge gives legal advice? Rarely does the Court set forth what whould have been the correct cause of action and then advise that there is still time. Ferousis v Santamarina 2018 NY Slip Op 32725(U) Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 154418/2018 Judge: Arlene P. Bluth is interesting, as well as… Continue Reading
By Andrew Lavoott Bluestone on Posted in Legal Malpractice Basics,Legal Malpractice Cases,UncategorizedArmstrong v. Blank Rome LLP, Supreme Court, New York County, Index No. 651881/2013, Justice David B. Cohen, J., offers three lessons in a matrimonial – legal malpractice case. The first is that such a case can survive the post-Katebi v. Fink landscape. The second is that an unexplained conflict of interest can lead to a good Judiciary… Continue Reading
By Andrew Lavoott Bluestone on Posted in Legal Malpractice BasicsSurely the longest running Judiciary Law§ 487 case known to man, Melcher v Greenberg Traurig LLP 2018 NY Slip Op 06310 Decided on September 27, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department has been modified and sent back to Supreme Court for trial. Previously it had been severely clipped and stripped of most of the damage claims by Supreme Court. “In… Continue Reading
By Andrew Lavoott Bluestone on Posted in Legal Malpractice BasicsMany JL § 487 cases are brought; few get to be considered for damages and far fewer ever get to the trier of fact. Yerushalmi v Schoenfeld 2018 NY Slip Op 05623 Decided on August 1, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department is an example. “In 2002, Malka Yerushalmi (hereinafter Malka) commenced an action for a divorce and ancillary relief… Continue Reading
By Andrew Lavoott Bluestone on Posted in Legal Malpractice BasicsHoltzman v Griffith 2018 NY Slip Op 04540 Decided on June 20, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department illustrates the almost overpowering quality of the “account stated” doctrine, in which the failure to object (in writing) to bills from attorneys (or others) can serve as a conclusion that the recipient has accepted the bills without objection and now must… Continue Reading
By Andrew Lavoott Bluestone on Posted in Legal Malpractice BasicsCastlewood Apparel Corp. v Davidoff Hutcher & Citron LLP 2018 NY Slip Op 30717(U) April 23, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 150167/2017 Judge: Shlomo S. Hagler is a case which displays an unusual degree of latitude in denying a 3211 motion to dismiss. We have written that these motions seem to get a greater degree of attention,… Continue Reading
By Andrew Lavoott Bluestone on Posted in Legal Malpractice BasicsLitigation is alternatively a blood sport or the sport of kings. It takes a lot of money and sometimes tempers flare. In Englese v Sladkus 2018 NY Slip Op 50625(U) Decided on April 25, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County St. George, J. we see what happens when a litigant speaks candidly without any filtering. “Steven D.… Continue Reading
By Andrew Lavoott Bluestone on Posted in Legal Malpractice Basics,UncategorizedPlaintiffs hired an attorney in order to purchase a condominium. Unfortunately, the condo was subject to mold and water damage. Razdolskaya v Lyubarsky 2018 NY Slip Op 02817 Decided on April 25, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department starts out with an analysis of why there is a fraud claim. It ends with an analysis of why the attorney… Continue Reading
By Andrew Lavoott Bluestone on Posted in Legal Malpractice BasicsLegal Malpractice claims accrue at the time a mistake is made. The Statute of limitations in legal malpractice, three years, is a difficult and high barrier to overcome. Continuous representation may toll the running of the statute, but social policy has set a number of elements required for continuous representation to be permitted. Stein Indus., Inc.… Continue Reading
By Andrew Lavoott Bluestone on Posted in Legal Malpractice BasicsWhat is discoverable and what is not discoverable in a professional negligence setting influences the viability of the claims. Attorney-Client privilege, work-product privilege and burdensomeness are all considerations in whether the material is discoverable. Judge Shulman gives a cogent explanation of the competing arguments in American Med. Alert Corp. v Evanston Ins. Co. 2018 NY Slip… Continue Reading
By Andrew Lavoott Bluestone on Posted in Legal Malpractice BasicsProfessional malpractice, other than for physicians and some medical providers is three years. Even with tolling for continuous representation, that three years can go by very quickly. In Schembre v Saggese 2018 NY Slip Op 30191(U) February 1, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 656328/2016 Judge: Saliann Scarpulla too much time went by for plaintiffs to continue the case.… Continue Reading
By Andrew Lavoott Bluestone on Posted in Legal Malpractice BasicsAccountants and stock-financial advisers are professionals for the purpose of the statute of limitations. For this reason the doctrine of “continuous representation” can apply. Reville v Melvin Ginsberg & Assoc. 2017 NY Slip Op 30821(U) April 20, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 152167/2015 Judge: Joan M. Kenney gives some explanation on how to calculate the statute of limitations… Continue Reading
By Andrew Lavoott Bluestone on Posted in Legal Malpractice Basics,UncategorizedLast week we discussed how the First Department differs in its handling of Judiciary Law § 487 cases. Here in Gorbatov v Tsirelman 2017 NY Slip Op 07979 Decided on November 15, 2017 Appellate Division, Second Department is a further lesson, this time from the Second Department. Conspicuously missing here is any language of delinquency. The Second Department… Continue Reading
By Andrew Lavoott Bluestone on Posted in Legal Malpractice BasicsThe jury system, along with the CPLR structure of motions and appeals can be cumbersome, long, but ultimately comforting. In contrast, the arbitration system plays to a single individual or tribunal, with no margin for reassessment. So went a case reported in the New York Law Journal, and sometime in the future will be determined… Continue Reading
By Andrew Lavoott Bluestone on Posted in Legal Malpractice BasicsPrivity between client and attorney is mirrored by the doctrine of the lack of a doctor-patient relationship. Forget that there was a failure to diagnose breast cancer, and that the result can be deadly. Social policy of limiting suits between patients and remote medical providers as well as the social policy of limiting legal malpractice… Continue Reading
