1.Laduca v. Levidow, Levidow & Oberman, 2005-04771, (Index Nos. 42874/01, 75061/02, 75419/02) , SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT , 2006 NY Slip Op 3545; Restoral to calendar permitted.
2.Rajasethupathy v. Gray, Feldman & Rosenbaum, LLP, 478, CA 05-01781 , SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT , 2006 NY Slip Op 3292; Motion for Summary judgment dismisses against one attorney defendant and finds liability against second defendant without a written opinion.
3. Edwards v. Siegel, Kelleher & Kahn, CA 05-01493 , SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT , 2006 NY Slip Op 3365; Two appeals, from the same day, in differing amounts of $ 294,000 and $ 454,000. Mystery: 2 cases or appellate mistakes?
4. Edwards v. Siegel, Kelleher & Kahn, CA 05-01494 , SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT , 2006 NY Slip Op 3366;
6. Peak v. Bartlett, Pontiff, Stewart & Rhodes, P.C., 98718 , SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENT , 2006 NY Slip Op 3135; SJ granted to defendants on proof that the “mistake” was actually plaintiff’s “adament ” choice.
6. Town of N. Hempstead v. Winston & Strawn, LLP, 2005-11879, (Index No. 19050/03) , SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT , 2006 NY Slip Op 3075; Previously reported dismissal on appeal.
7. Lai v. Gartlan, 8263-8264, Index 602425/02 , SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT , 2006 NY Slip Op 2655; 811 N.Y.S.2d 917; Dismissal on statute of limitations granted when it appears that while general representation continues, no proof that work continued on the same case.
8. Casement v. O’Neill, 2005-00670, (Index No. 3880/04) , SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT , 2006 NY Slip Op 2711;
Plaintiff pled guilty in a criminal matter.No malpractice cause of action.
9.Brown v. Connell, 04 Civ. 10152 (PAC)(GWG) , UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Legal malpractice dismissed in another criminal setting. Further: no ineffective assistance of counsel.
2. Sash v. Dudley, 05 Civ. 7498 (SAS) , UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK , Previously reported legal malpractice after criminal conviction for WTC fraud.