Here is a case from New Jersey which gives a full explanation of "judicial estoppel" and its application to legal malpractice. Generally, the issue comes up when a client agrees to a settlement, which it later finds to be inadequate. The legal malpractice case which follows is defended, in part, by the assertion that the
Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Andrew Lavoott Bluestone has been an attorney for 40 years, with a career that spans criminal prosecution, civil litigation and appellate litigation. Mr. Bluestone became an Assistant District Attorney in Kings County in 1978, entered private practice in 1984 and in 1989 opened his private law office and took his first legal malpractice case.
Since 1989, Bluestone has become a leader in the New York Plaintiff’s Legal Malpractice bar, handling a wide array of plaintiff’s legal malpractice cases arising from catastrophic personal injury, contracts, patents, commercial litigation, securities, matrimonial and custody issues, medical malpractice, insurance, product liability, real estate, landlord-tenant, foreclosures and has defended attorneys in a limited number of legal malpractice cases.
Bluestone also took an academic role in field, publishing the New York Attorney Malpractice Report from 2002-2004. He started the “New York Attorney Malpractice Blog” in 2004, where he has published more than 4500 entries.
Mr. Bluestone has written 38 scholarly peer-reviewed articles concerning legal malpractice, many in the Outside Counsel column of the New York Law Journal. He has appeared as an Expert witness in multiple legal malpractice litigations.
Mr. Bluestone is an adjunct professor of law at St. John’s University College of Law, teaching Legal Malpractice. Mr. Bluestone has argued legal malpractice cases in the Second Circuit, in the New York State Court of Appeals, each of the four New York Appellate Divisions, in all four of the U.S. District Courts of New York and in Supreme Courts all over the state. He has also been admitted pro haec vice in the states of Connecticut, New Jersey and Florida and was formally admitted to the US District Court of Connecticut and to its Bankruptcy Court all for legal malpractice matters. He has been retained by U.S. Trustees in legal malpractice cases from Bankruptcy Courts, and has represented municipalities, insurance companies, hedge funds, communications companies and international manufacturing firms. Mr. Bluestone regularly lectures in CLEs on legal malpractice.
Based upon his professional experience Bluestone was named a Diplomate and was Board Certified by the American Board of Professional Liability Attorneys in 2008 in Legal Malpractice. He remains Board Certified. He was admitted to The Best Lawyers in America from 2012-2019. He has been featured in Who’s Who in Law since 1993.
In the last years, Mr. Bluestone has been featured for two particularly noteworthy legal malpractice cases. The first was a settlement of an $11.9 million dollar default legal malpractice case of Yeo v. Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman which was reported in the NYLJ on August 15, 2016. Most recently, Mr. Bluestone obtained a rare plaintiff’s verdict in a legal malpractice case on behalf of the City of White Plains v. Joseph Maria, reported in the NYLJ on February 14, 2017. It was the sole legal malpractice jury verdict in the State of New York for 2017.
Bluestone has been at the forefront of the development of legal malpractice principles and has contributed case law decisions, writing and lecturing which have been recognized by his peers. He is regularly mentioned in academic writing, and his past cases are often cited in current legal malpractice decisions. He is recognized for his ample writings on Judiciary Law § 487, a 850 year old statute deriving from England which relates to attorney deceit.
Legal Malpractice Verdict after Medical Malpractice in a Death Case
Failure to diagnose breast cancer…it’s a horrible thing. When we think of a family member who could have been saved, who dies because of medical negligence, where a simple mammogram or simply reading it correctly could have made a difference…
Here, after a death, the medical malpractice case was bungled, and a legal malpractice case…
A Milestone Reached
Today, we reach 1500 articles on Legal Malpractice.
We would like to thank our readers for persevering with us through server breakdowns, slow story days, and our exploration of the legal malpractice world.
Are Experts Always Necessary in Legal Malpractice?
Experts are generally, but not always necessary in legal malpractice cases. The test is whether a fact-finder can rely upon its own knowledge. Here is an interesting case, Frances Northrop, respondent, v Eric Ole Thorsen, appellant. (Index No. 5684/04) ,2007-00973 ,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT ,
2007 NY Slip…
Recent Cases in Legal Malpractice
RECENT CASES IN LEGAL MALPRACTICE
1. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v BARBARA J. MAZULA, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant; JAMES E. KEABLE, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENT
2008 NY Slip Op 27
January 3, 2008
This is a case in which the question becomes whether an individual…
Contingent Fees, Appeals and Legal Malpractice
Attorneys and clients enter into contingent fee retainer agreements, which do not directly address the question of an appeal. Is the legal fee for an appeal the responsibility of the client or the attorney in this situation? Here is a case from Madison/St.Clair which discusses this question:
"A legal malpractice claim filed by Donel Johnson…
Cuban Embargo, Legal Advice and Legal Malpractice
It’s winter, and our thoughts turn to the Caribbean. Here, a Philadelphia law firm, 1400 lawyers strong, gave commercial advice pertaining to the Cuban embargo, and are now defendants in a legal malpractice case. Here is the story from Bloomberg, via the Caribbean news agency.
"NEW YORK, USA (Bloomberg): Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, the largest…
Barnett v. Schwartz and Pre-Judgment Interest in Legal Malpractice
The question of pre-judgment interest in legal malpractice has not been widely understood . Generally, it was thought that an award of pre-judgment interest was determined on the same basis as in the underlying case. Contract damages, yes. Pain and suffereing, no.
However, this case indicates that the real inquiry is whether there should be pre-judgment…
A Seminal Case in Legal Malpractice
This is a seminal, important case which will, we predict, be widely cited and discussed in Legal Malpractice. Barnett v. Schwartz, 2007 NY Slip Op. 09712, 2d Dept, December 11, 2007 is important for several reasons. We’ll discuss the first here
“But for” causation is not as difficult as had previously been believed.
Does the…
Attorney Fees, Dismissal and Legal Malpractice
Here is an article from Hinshaw which tells us that "A law firm may represent itself and may pursue not only contract or quasi-contract but also tort theories in suing a former client, at least as long as the amount sought in damages does not exceed the amount of unpaid legal fees"
"Law firm Pedersen…