This is an Appellate Division 1st Department case, in accountant malpractice, not legal, but the lesson is similar.  No continuous representation, as each tax year was different, staute of limitations lost on the malpractice, but fraud causes of action still permitted.

Mitschele, plaintiff-appellant v. Schultz, defendants-respondents

APPELLATE DIVISION
FIRST DEPARTMENT

"However, the fraud cause of

We have never heard of this before, but apparently its a movement.  Unbundled legal services are proceeding under a Mass program where an attorney represents a client in only one appearance, or for a small, singular issue, without taking over representation as a whole.  We have reservations about what happens when the case goes sour. 

The "Anti-Divorce’" attorney has posted a site which trolls for legal malpractice cases.  His pitch?  He sues attorneys who settle divorce cases without the client’s permission, when the client really wants to stay married.  Don’t clients have to allocute to the settlement in open court?  Anyway, the site.

Here is an example of how attorney fee cases lead to a plethora of work, trouble, litigation, and a very slim chnace of making any money.  Attorney represents client in California case.  Client does not pay $ 4000 in legal fees.  Attorney sues client for $ 4000.  Client has a NY attorney friend, who will