Manhattan real estate is a steady source of legal malpractice cases. It sometimes seems that there are too few clients, as conflict of interest claims often accompany the legal malpractice claims. Here, too, defendant is accused of having too many clients in187 St. Mazal Manager, LLC v Herrick Feinstein LLP 2019 NY Slip
Legal Malpractice Cases
The Purpose of Damages in a Judiciary Law 487 Setting
Judiciary Law § 487 is the oldest statute in the US common law, dating from medieval English law. It’s purpose is to regulate and punish deceit by attorneys. The First Department looks at the purpose of Judiciary Law § 487 damages in Jean v Chinitz 2018 NY Slip Op 05521 [163 AD3d 497] July 26,…
Some Damages Well Alleged, Some Not
Most people fixate on the first element of legal malpractice – departure from good practice. Leeder v Antonucci 2019 NY Slip Op 05898 Decided on July 31, 2019
Appellate Division, Fourth Department looks at the last of the elements – ascertainable damages, as well as examines continuous representation in a statute of limitations setting.
“We…
Seminal Legal Malpractice Principles Illustrated
Knox v Aronson, Mayefsky & Sloan, LLP 2018 NY Slip Op 09030 [168 AD3d 70] December 27, 2018 Singh, J. Appellate Division, First Department illustrates some important and bedrock doctrines found in legal malpractice: the “but for” requirement, the “successor attorney” doctrine and the question of “duplication.”
“In July 2013, plaintiff sought to temporarily move…
An Adequately Pled Judiciary Law 487 Claim
It’s rare to see a Judiciary Law § 487 Claim; even rarer to see one that survives motion practice. Gerard Fox Law, P.C. v Vortex Group, LLC 2019 NY Slip Op 32065(U) July 9, 2019
Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 654794/2018 Judge: Andrew Borrok is a case which makes the successful leap.
“This…
The Work Has To Be Done to Avoid Summary Judgment
Graves v Stanclift, Ludemann, McMorris & Silvestri, P.C. 2019 NY Slip Op 05608 Decided on July 11, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department is the story of a legal malpractice claim which alleges that the attorneys simply did no work in opposition to summary judgment and that the documents and facts existed which would have successfully…
Too Early To Avoid Being Late
The statute of limitations is approaching yet plaintiff has not suffered ascertainable damages. Potential damages loom, but nothing has actually happened yet. What to do if your attorney has made a mistake (perhaps a big mistake) yet actual ascertainable damages may yet be speculative?
The short answer is to commence the action and fight over…
No Privity? No Claim
Hinnant v Carrington Mtge. Servs., LLC 2019 NY Slip Op 03575 [172 AD3d 827] May 8, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department is an example of overeaching by plaintiff, seeking to bring in the opponent’s attorney. There is no privity with the opponent’s attorney absent some very small exceptions. Privity is a requirement for a good…
Good and Duplicitive Claims in Professional Negligence
Architects, similar to attorneys, can be liable for general torts as well as breach of contract. For the most part, it’s one or the other. In Junger v John V. Dinan Assoc., Inc. 2018 NY Slip Op 06232 [164 AD3d 1428] September 26, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department we see how the claims are evaluated.…
The Statute of Limitations Simply Explained
In Jonns v Fischbarg 2019 NY Slip Op 31919(U) July 3, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County
Docket Number: 150729/2017 Judge Kathryn Freed gives a nice cogent explanation of two recurring legal malpractice principles. One is how the statute of limitations is calculated and the other is whether multiple causes of action. We’ll look at…