Malpractice, as delineated from mere negligence, is that of a “professional toward a person for whom a service is rendered. Santiago v. 13 70 Broadway Assoc., L. P., 264 A.D .2d 624 (I 51 Dept 1999). ” The statute of limitations for all professionals other than physicians is 3 years. It’s 2.5 years for
Legal Malpractice Cases
Ask and Ye Shall Receive…
In this season, gifts are being shuttled around, and many look to receive. Board of Mgrs. of Brightwater Towers Condominium v SNS Org., Ltd. 2017 NY Slip Op 31791(U) August 24, 2017 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 503102/16 Judge: Lawrence S. Knipel is an example what happens when one asks correctly for a second…
A Judiciary Law 487 Case Gone Bad
Judiciary Law § 487 cases are very very hard to bring. In the First Department they are even harder to maintain. When such a case is brought pro-se, the chances of viability plummet. So it was with Rondeau v Bargman 2017 NY Slip Op 32256(U) October 19, 2017
Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:…
Continuous Representation To Be Determined by Arbitrator
Arbitration clauses in professional malpractice settings are not absolute, but they can be very persuasive to Courts. When presented with defenses to an arbitration clause, or to other clauses contained in the agreement between client and professional, the Court may take up the issue and decide it, or it can send the issue to the…
Proximate Cause and the Accountant
Mistakes, mistakes, shoddy performance! This is what malpractice cases are all about. However, litigation over these issues is rarely simply about the mistake. It’s the surround that matters so much more. The “surround” ? What we mean by this is the more subtle issues such as proximate cause, professional strategy, etc. Vitale v Koenig 2017…
A Primer in Continuous Representation
For a well written discussion of the elements of continuous representation, we suggest that RJR Mech. Inc. v Ruvoldt 2017 NY Slip Op 31232(U) June 8, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 158764/2015 Judge: Jeffrey K. Oing serves as a prime example.
” As in the first action, the. complaint in the second…
Vicarious Liability and Planning for Emergencies
A simple fact pattern. Customer comes to store, is offered valet parking. Customer gives car to valet driver, who proceeds to strike a pedestrian. Who may be responsible and how do the liabilities of the store, the valet service, the valet driver interact?
Berger v Rokeach 2017 NY Slip Op 27374 Decided on November 20,…
For Lack of An Expert, the Case is Lost
Professional negligence similar to legal malpractice deals with areas of specialized knowledge. When the term “specialized knowledge” is used, the trial lawyer thinks: “admissibility”, “lay juries” and “experts.” In Herman v Franke, Gottsegen, Cox Architects 2017 NY Slip Op 07980
Decided on November 15, 2017 Appellate Division, Second Department one side utilized an expert, the…
Notice and an Opportunity to be Heard in a Sanctions Case
Plaintiff sued under Judiciary Law § 487 and was promptly the subject of sanctions and dismissal. Supreme Court granted both, and an appeal ensued. In Liang v Wei Ji 2017 NY Slip Op 08361
Decided on November 29, 2017 Appellate Division, Second Department, the Court affirmed because plaintiff had previously been enjoined from starting any…
The Field Is Winnowed, and the Case Goes On
It takes a while to work through the events of Josephs v AACT Fast Collections Servs., Inc.
2017 NY Slip Op 08357 Decided on November 29, 2017 Appellate Division, Second Department and to determine whether it was a mistake not to oppose a motion for dismissal. Near the end of the decision we see…