Was there an attorney-client relationship or not? That will be the central issue in Prott v Lewin & Baglio, LLP 2017 NY Slip Op 03786 Decided on May 10, 2017 Appellate Division, Second Department. Defendants sought to prove at the pre-answer stage that the relationship had ended. The documentary proof was incompetent for purposes of
Legal Malpractice Cases
A Mild Description of Some Vicious Litigation
Often, an appellate decision is phrased in mild, soothing language, masking the trench warfare taking place beneath the surface. Polanco v Greenstein & Milbauer, LLP 2017 NY Slip Op 03707 Decided on May 9, 2017 Appellate Division, First Department is a prime example. Note the level upon which defendants treated plaintiff’s expert.
Beyond the way…
A Dead Client, a Dead Case
Estate cases sometimes run into the dead man’s statute, and even if not, there are unique difficulties in providing proofs of intent, which are sometimes very, very important. In Steffan v Wilensky
2017 NY Slip Op 03602 Decided on May 4, 2017 Appellate Division, First Department plaintiff can no longer prove that the bank account…
The Witness Was Not Reminded; The Case Was Lost
Courts often take claims of attorney mistakes short of the outright failure to start a case not so seriously. Many the act, which plaintiff claims is a departure, is said to be a failing but permitted strategic decision. Not so in Caso v Miranda Sambursky Sloane Sklarin Ver Veniotis LLP
2017 NY Slip Op 03607 …
What is A Fiduciary Relationship?
In legal malpractice cases it is presumed, generally conclusively, that an attorney is a fiduciary of the client. That principle probably derives from the education and licensing of the attorney. It can be true in many other relationships, as Milonakis v Haralampopoulos 2017 NY Slip Op 30863(U) April 26, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County …
Continuous Representation in the Accounting Field
The statute of limitations is a fierce barrier to litigation. Time ticks by in an excruciating but unstoppable parade. Three years can go by in a flash. The only toll to the statute (barring another inevitable, death) is continuous representation. It applies in legal malpractice as well as in accounting malpractice. In Reville v Melvin …
She Wanted Air – She Got Brick
Widlitz v Douglas Elliman, LLC Decided on April 19, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County
Bluth, J. is a quintessential New York City story. Basically, Plaintiff buys into a newly constructed building, does so long prior to completion of the building, asks and expects “city views” but gets a view of a brick wall. Whose…
Attorney Who Would Not Take Case Sued For Not Taking Case
In what appears to us to be a novel theory of law, Plaintiff in Olabopo v Scola 2017 NY Slip Op 30826(U) April 21, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 157461/2016 Judge: Robert D. Kalish seems to be suing because Defendant attorneys did not take the case. This is a different situation from…
An Intemperate Act Adds Years to a Litigation
Litigation is difficult, and takes a long time. When snap decisions are made, they often add to the difficulties, not resolve them. Liew v Jeffrey Samel & Partners 2017 NY Slip Op 03165
Decided on April 26, 2017 Appellate Division, Second Department is an example. While the parties were muddling towards trial, a sudden dismissal…
More Contradictory Judiciary Law 487 Cases
Does a successfully pleaded Judiciary Law § 487 case require a conviction for a misdemeanor ? A recent Magistrate’s report in the Western District of New York strikingly says so. In Bounkhoun v. Barnes, the magistrate determined that no JL 487 case may lay without a misdemeanor conviction.
The First Department may not think…