Defense attorneys in legal malpractice cases typically raise several arguments against plaintiff.  One is that plaintiff had multiple attorneys which they posit indicates lack of merit or rigor in the case.  Another argument is that plaintiff is just monday-morning-quarterbacking, or whatever simile they choose.  Sadly, sometimes they are correct, and Hyman v Schwartz   2016 NY

“But for” proximate cause is the black hole of legal malpractice and in a way, of all litigation.  The question of whether a mistakes really makes a difference is central to the entire legal system.  Did you look away from the road for a second?  Yes.  Did it make a difference?  Did you overstate the

Professional is hired to examine accounts.  In this case it was a CPA who was hired to look into a situation in which there was unexpected cash flow for a Municipality.  The CPA reviewed some documents and said he could find nothing.  Is that the end of the story?  What happens when it’s discovered that