Plaintiff makes a loan using an attorney. The attorney is hired to make sure the loan is collateralized and if not paid, there will be a security interest in other property. The law firm fails to file the correct lien papers, and the loan is lost. While this might be legal malpractice, is it also
Legal Malpractice Cases
The Fight Over Fees Was As Big As The Fight Over Liability
Labor Law Cases which arise from construction accidents often have large numbers attached to them. After all, people can get really hurt when they fall on a construction site. So was the situation in Doviak v Lowe’s Home Ctrs., Inc. 2015 NY Slip Op 09333 Decided on December 17, 2015 Appellate Division, Third Department.
The…
A Poster Child for Privity as a Hurdle in Legal Malpractice
Imagine that Wife owns a co-operative apartment and has some undefined problems there. Litigation ensues, and at a settlement conference her husband, who is not a party, is escorted from the robing room because of disruptive conduct. Rather than simply remain calm, or fume, husband, who has a rich history of litigating frivolous issues, sues…
A Marriage Gone Sour, A Divorce Gone Sour, and Now Contempt
The retaining lien, a powerful tool for attorneys to force payment of legal fees, is but one of a number of strategies in the eternal attorney fee dispute world. MG v RG 2015 NY Slip Op 51851(U) Decided on December 10, 2015 Supreme Court, Kings County Adams, J. is an example of the lengths to…
The Question of Experts in Summary Judgments Motions is Now Settled
As happens from time to time, outlier Appellate Division decisions give rise to a new rule of law, which sometimes does not make sense. The question of when a party has to disclose experts is unique in NY law. Corresponding Federal practice has rigid discovery dates, preclusion if the expert is not disclosed, depositions of…
Sometimes Supreme Court Acts Too Quickly To Dismiss
Legal malpractice cases are subject to a level of scrutiny greater than all other cases in the “but for” determination. That’s built into the legal malpractice world along with the privity rule and is there for social policy reasons. If it were not, then every case, whether lost by plaintiff or defendant would immediately morph…
Judiciary Law 487 Claim Goes To Trial
Few Judiciary Law 487 claims survive the rugged course of litigation and make it over the last hurdle. Here, in Ginsburg Dev. Cos., LLC v Carbone 2015 NY Slip Op 09250 Decided on December 16, 2015 Appellate Division, Second Department the Second Department affirmed Supreme Court and left the JL 487 claim for trial. Interestingly,…
No Privity, No Near-Privity, No Case
One of the defining characteristics of professional malpractice, which differs from negligence as a whole, is the concept of privity. If a washing machine is negligently designed, anyone hurt in using the machine can sue. However, in professional and legal malpractice one may sue only those with whom they have a professional relationship, one of…
Are Experts Required in Legal Malpractice Bench Trials?
We had not considered the question of how a bench trial and a jury trial might differ in the use of experts. Remembering that an expert is necessary when the experience of an ordinary trier of fact does not encompass the issues, we recently ran across Oikonomos, Inc. v Bahrenberg
2015 NY Slip Op 51300(U)…
The Rare Departure From Privity
Mr. San, LLC v Zucker & Kwestel, LLP 2013 NY Slip Op 08416 [112 AD3d 796] December 18, 2013 Appellate Division, Second Department is the very rare departure from the rule of strict privity in legal malpractice. The exception is well known, and often quoted: ” fraud, collusion, malicious acts or other special circumstances.” Knowing…