LaTouche v Terezakis 2015 NY Slip Op 07821 Decided on October 28, 2015 Appellate Division, Second Department illustrates the perils of summary judgment motion practice. In all litigation, and in legal malpractice litigation to a higher degree, cases are sorted out and culled at the summary judgment level on a increasing basis. Defendants almost always
Legal Malpractice Cases
The Statute of Limitations Begins When the Malpractice is Committed
Time passes quickly, and the right to sue can simply pass us by. When time is running in statute of limitations terms, all can be lost, as it was in Yardeny v. Tanenbaum
Decided on October 28, 2015 2015 NY Slip Op 07834 Appellate Division, Second Department.
“he three-year statute of limitations on a cause…
How Does The Appellate Division Signal Its Displeasure?
The Appellate Divisions of New York are deluged with appeals. In the First and Second Departments, there are 20 appeals scheduled for oral argument every day. In the general range of cases before the ADs, one sees a range of decisions. Some are thoughtful, some summary but each has its own signals embedded. In Esposito …
Really…How Could This Happen, and is it the Attorney’s Fault?
Ragunandan v Donado 2015 NY Slip Op 31957(U) October 23, 2015 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 12332 2012 Judge: David Elliot, is a case which caused us some head-scratching. Plaintiff was able to purchase a large number of real properties in Queens and rent them out. How did she cooperate in letting it all…
The Vast “But For” Wilderness in Professional Malpractice
Sure, it is easy to point out the shortcomings of professionals. They waited too long, they argued the wrong point, they were not forceful enough, they issued an overly critical report which was unwarranted! While most persons intuitively feel that identifying the shortcoming is the major part of the exercise, it is showing proximate cause,…
Accountants, Mistakes and Limitations of Liability
Bank hires accountants. Accountants fail to file an extension. Bank loses $ 2.5 Million in carry-back losses. Seems simple, no? Not simple.
In First Cent. Sav. Bank v Parentebeard, LLC 2015 NY Slip Op 31921(U) October 13, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 653680/2014 Judge: Shirley Werner Kornreich we see a limitation of…
Legal Malpractice From the Disciplinary Committee’s Viewpoint
Disciplinary charges are not an uncommon event, but we have rarely read of self-destructive conduct as is set forth in Matter of Frelix 2015 NY Slip Op 07775 Decided on October 22, 2015
Appellate Division, First Department Per Curiam. The conduct brought a 5 year suspension (they hinted that disbarment was just avoided). What is…
“We Were Following Orders” is not a Defense in Legal Malpractice
Attorneys have their own special obligations in handling financial matters for their clients. When they are told to wire money to a third party, they have some obligation to check on the bona fides of the recipient. They may not blindly follow wrongful or fraudulent orders. This is the reason we see summary judgment fail…
A Mega-Huge Legal Malpractice Case Ends in the Court of Appeals
There are legal malpractice cases, and then, there are world-class multi-million dollar cases of legal malpractice. Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP 2015 NY Slip Op 07693 Decided on October 22, 2015 Court of Appeals Rivera, J. is one of the latter types. It involves commercial mortgage-backed securitization and this case…
For Summary Judgment Cover all the Bases or be Picked Off
For this fine October day, we employ a baseball catch-phrase. Defendants moved for summary judgment saying that plaintiffs could not prove at least one of the elements of legal malpractice. Plaintiffs demonstrated that they could prove at least one of their claims. Result? The case went on to settlement. Smith v Kaplan Belsky Ross Bartell, …