Claims against a professional for negligence arise from policy reasons, not simply from breach of contract grounds. So, a non-architect might still be liable for professional negligence. Silverboys, LLC v Skordas 2015 NY Slip Op 31711(U) September 4, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 653874/2014 Judge: Saliann Scarpulla is the story of a
Legal Malpractice Cases
The Difference Between “Fraud on the Court” and Judiciary Law 487
Judiciary Law §487 is a really really old common law provision coming to us from medieval England. Fraud on the Court has been happening since the first day a court was held anywhere. They are similar, but have differences. Tooker v Schwartzberg 2015 NY Slip Op 31620(U)
August 17, 2015 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket…
No Legal Malpractice Alleged; A Lot of Fraud Claimed
How does continuous representation interplay with claims of fraud by attorneys? Hansen-Nord v Youmans 2015 NY Slip Op 31684(U) September 1, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 651924/2014 Judge: Anil C. Singh discusses the unusual situation in which an attorney and a law firm are accused of aiding and abetting fraud, but not…
What Makes a Decision Strategic Rather Than Negligence?
Continuing to look at Tantleff v Kestenbaum & Mark 2015 NY Slip Op 06720 Decided on September 2, 2015 the Appellate Division, Second Department answers that discussion and a rational explanation for a decision may well make it strategic rather than negligence.
“Here, the cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice accrued on…
Continuous Representation in a Tax Setting
Attorney gives advice to sign a certain tax document, and the result is additional or unnecessary tax liability. When does the statute of limitations commence and under what circumstances might it be tolled?
Tantleff v Kestenbaum & Mark 2015 NY Slip Op 06720 Decided on September 2, 2015 Appellate Division, Second Department gives an answer…
The Everpresent and Luring Fraud Shadow to a Legal Malpractice Claim
Fidelity Natl. Tit. Ins. Co. v Smith Buss & Jacobs, LLP March 17, 2015 Appellate Division, First Department is a reminder that behind many legal malpractice cases there lurks the hint that this was all fraud and not merely a mistake.
“The complaint alleges that the sponsor of 16 apartment units in a condominium development,…
Aren’t You Working on that Appeal?
Further analysis of Sitomer v Goldweber Epstein, LLP 2015 NY Slip Op 31541(U) August 14, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 158325/13 Judge: Barbara Jaffe continues today on the issue of whether it is legal malpractice not to take an appeal for the client. The retainer agreement tends to serve as the deciding…
A Host of Legal Malpractice Issues in a Divorce Setting
Plaintiff was a well-0ff husband facing an upcoming divorce. He retained attorneys well in advance of the proceedings and was girded for war. Then, things fell apart. How did this happen, and are the attorneys to blame?
Sitomer v Goldweber Epstein, LLP 2015 NY Slip Op 31541(U) August 14, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County …
A Lot of Legal Malpractice Activity over $ 15,000
The oft-repeated statement that legal fee actions invite counterclaims is amply demonstrated in Law Offs. of Ira H. Leibowitz v Landmark Ventures, Inc. 2015 NY Slip Op 06575
Decided on August 19, 2015 Appellate Division, Second Department where a lot of litigation, and an appeal has gone on regarding what appears to be a claim…
Judiciary Law 487 and File Churning
Totally unexpected players in an attorney-fee-legal-malpractice case have led to a very interesting decision by Justice Kern that touches on a number of legal malpractice issues. Today, we will discuss the Judiciary Law § 487 claim for file churning in Kagan Lubic Lepper Findelstein & Gold LLP v 325 Fifth Ave. Condominium 2015 NY…