Legal malpractice litigation is often viewed with a gimlet eye. This is a 50’s expression meaning a sharp or knowing look. Courts often believe that legal malpractice counterclaims are merely a method of trying not to pay legal fees. As has been observed elsewhere, attorney fees are dear to the heart of attorneys.
Legal Malpractice News
Equitable Estoppel and Legal Malpractice
Equitable Estoppel is a principal which comes into play most often when a case is not commenced within the statute of limitations. The theory is that plaintiff was lulled into not starting the case by a wrongful act of defendant. Considering that blown statutes of limitations are one well recognized basis for legal malpractice cases, the two…
Who is to Blame in this Legal Malpractice Case?
It appears that one of two law firms is to blame for plaintiff’s medical malpractice fiasco. Which is it? InLopresti v Bamundo, Zwal & Schermerhorn, LLP, ;2010 NY Slip Op 33436(U); December 14, 2010; Judge: Martin Shulman we see a familiar problem. A medical malpractice death case sets two different time clocks running. …
Ice and Snow Cases with Legal Malpractice
We’re sure that the Appellate Division did not plan this, but shortly after the first snow of the season, and in the middle of a span of days each with temperatures less than 25 degrees, we read the following case with interest. In Walker v Glotzer ; 2010 NY Slip Op 09126 ; Decided on…
Mistakes Happen to Everyone in Legal Malpractice
Board of Mgrs. of the Bay Club v Borah, Goldstein, Altschuler, Schwartz & Nahins, P.C. ; 2010 NY Slip Op 52129(U) ; Decided on December 13, 2010 ; Supreme Court, Queens County ; Markey, J. is a legal malpractice case against one of the best known and best regarded landlord law firms in NY. …
Premature Distribution and Legal Malpractice
Proving the point that attorneys should not dabble in areas of the law unfamiliar them, we learned of the "7 month Rule" in estate and trust work. The rule is that an executor is not liable for good faith distribution of estate proceeds if the distribution takes place at least 7 months after the death.
https://blog.bluestonelawfirm.com/2010/12/legal-malpractice-news/3067/
Bernardi v Spyratos ; 2010 NY Slip Op 09097 ;Decided on December 7, 2010 ;Appellate Division, Second Department is the story of two neighbors who have locked horns over a waterfront property. There are issues of encroachment, adverse possession, hidden water damage, legal malpractice and failures to take a survey at or before closing. Important…
Work-Product and Legal Malpractice Discovery
We continue to the second issue raised in Leviton Mfg. Co., Inc., v. Greenberg Traurig LLP, et al., , 09 Civ. 8083 (GBD) (THK); U.S. District Court, Southern District illustrates theprincipals of "at issue" attorney-client privilege and " work-product" discovery.
What documents must be turned over to defendants when they are sued? Must…
“At issue” and “Work Product” in Legal Malpractice Litigation
Discovery in legal malpractice litigation often turn around the "but for" portion of the case. The question of why was the underlying case ultimately lost, why didn’t plaintiff succeed with successor counsel and why are we responsible for this bad outcome, are often heard, and usually must be dealt with. Here in Leviton Mfg. Co., …
It’s Always the Case Within a Case in Legal Malpractice
Legal malpractice proofs have 4 elements. They are Departure, Proximity, "But for" and Ascertainable damages. The sad truth is that in almost every human endeavor, one may find departures. In a case that goes to trial, there are arguably many departures. A simple question must be asked: "Did this departure proximately cause permanent damage, and…