The more things change, the more they stay the same, say the French. In the Estates and Trust – legal malpractice world, this saying is illustrated by Leff v Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P. ;2010 NY Slip Op 08443 ;Decided on November 18, 2010 ;Appellate Division, First Department. There has been a revolution in this world
Legal Malpractice News
Decedents, Estates and Legal Malpractice
The rule of privity in legal malpractice is very strong. It exists as a "bright line" that admits of few exceptions. One recent anomaly is that of decedents, estates and standing. In an article from today’s NYLJ. Raymond Radigan and Jennifer F. Hillman, write the following:
"In a significant decision this summer, Schneider v. …
More on Legal Malpractice and 306-b
Bumpus v New York City Tr. Auth. ;2009 NY Slip Op 05737 [66 AD3d 26] ;July 7, 2009 ;Dillon, J., J. discusses what to do when the defendant can’t be identified, or served within a 120 day period. On Wednesday we discussed the first two options: making a motion after the 120 days have…
How Does the Court Gauge Damage Claims in Legal Malpractice Cases?
One frequently sees an argument made in motions to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (multiple sub-divisions) in which evidentiary material is submitted by defendant, and it is argued that damages cannot be ascertained or proven.
In Simpson v Alter ;2010 NY Slip Op 08089 ;Decided on November 9, 2010 ;Appellate Division, Second Department the…
CPLR 306-b and Legal Malpractice
Over the years, the rules of service of process have changed. Once, long ago, a case was commenced when defendants were served with a summons and complaint and an index number was purchased only when necessary. Later, in 1992 a commencement by index number rule started, and questions of service then arose. Under CPLR 306-b…
Judges Engaging in Legal Malpractice Litigation
What happens when Judges hire attorneys to litigate election law matters? The same thing that happens when ordinary people litigate. Some litigations end in legal malpractice cases. That is true of Simpson v Alter ; 2010 NY Slip Op 08089 ; Decided on November 9, 2010 ;Appellate Division, Second Department.
In this follow up to…
A Jury Question in Legal Malpractice
This case cuts to the center of a legal malpractice case, nicely illustrating the difference between legal malpractice and all other disciplines. Greene v Sager ; 2010 NY Slip Op 08068 ; Decided on November 9, 2010 ;Appellate Division, Second Department is a twin story. First the mistake by the attorney: "The defendants were retained…
How Does Legal Malpractice Happen?
Attorneys care about their clients. Attorneys work hard and have reasons to perform good work. Attorneys make mistakes, and have high case loads. Attorneys have their own interests at heart.
These are contradictory thoughts that cannot be reconciled. Here, in the story of Richard F. Gluszak we see some of the contradictory story-lines. "The Grievance…
Per se Legal Malpractice Negligence and Workers’ Compensation Settlements
Practitioners are supposed to know not only how to gain a client, but how to settle a case without causing collateral damage. One such trap, though well known, open and obvious, is the settlement of tort actions when plaintiff has been awarded Workers’ Compensation benefits. In short, before settling a tort action where plaintiff has…
A Trend Gathers Steam in Legal Malpractice
Change in the law is sometimes revolutionary, and more often incremental. A stunning example of incremental change is a trend in legal malpractice arising from matrimonial actions. Often, if not universal, matrimonial actions are settled in open court stipulations, set on the record. For some historical reason, in matrimonial "allocutions" as well as in criminal plea…