New York corporation has a California case. An attorney comes calling, soliciting business and asking the corporation to hire the California attorney. They agree, and in the retainer agreement are two items. One is a jurisdiction choice and one is an arbitration clause. Problems arise, and a fee dispute/legal malpractice counterclaim starts. Will it be
Legal Malpractice News
Disgorgement in a Breach of Fiduciary Duty-Legal Malpractice Case
Reisner v. Litman & Litman PC is a motorcycle – car collision case in which plaintiff was driving his motorcycle in Nassau County. He was driving on a road that had become known to be dangerous. At this particular intersection there had been a large number of turning left accidents, which later was said to be…
Representing Both Sides and No Retainer Agreement in Legal Malpractice Case
A series of loans, a single attorney in the transactions, a failure to file the mortgage, a defense that the clients should have filed the mortgage themselves, a loss of $ 750,000. How can this happen to sophisticated lenders?
The question is not exactly answered, but the picture that emerges from Brija v. Fernandez …
A Side Trip Throught Bankruptcy, Factoring and Legal Malpractice
The rapid transferring back and forth of rights and liabilities, through assignments, factoring and bankruptcy is highlighted in Maggioni v Clyde Meredith Schaefer, Esq., NY SlipOp 32544 [Sup.Ct. New York County, Wooten. J]
Apparently IFT International Inc. was a worthwhile football. It and its assets bounced back and forth between Bankruptcy Court and Supreme Court, with…
Continuous Representation in a Two Part Legal Malpractice Case
Gatto v Burke & Burke, NY Slip Op 32511, Nassau County, Justice Bucaria illustrates a two part transactional represent ion by attorneys of the clients in a business sale case. Facts are simple: plaintiff sells restaurant to X and uses target attorneys as transactional counsel. Sale documents do not have a security interest for Plaintiff-seller. …
Privilege and Legal Malpractice
An attorney must carefully and assiduously guard his client’s confidences, secrets and communications with the attorney. This remains true until the attorney has to defend himself. Must this defense be to criminal charges, or to ethical charges only? The answer is set forth in a recently decided case in the First Department.Hélie v McDermott, …
Bankruptcy Hearings and Res Judicata
We have commented about the Collateral Estoppel trap in legal malpractice with regard to fee arbitrations and hearings. in short, when a court grants an attorney fee application, it implicitly determines that there can have been no malpractice, as the court may not award fees in the face of malpractice. Fee arbitrations and hearings in…
A Car Case, Some Mistakes, Legal Malpractice
An interesting phenomenon in legal malpractice is the persistence of errors in a long series of otherwise isolated incidents. DiGiacomo v Levine ;2010 NY Slip Op 06566 ; Decided on September 14, 2010 ; Appellate Division, Second Department illustrates how this hoppers.
Auto accident takes place and clients hire attorney 1. Attorney 1…
It’s Too Early for Legal Malpractice
Ripeness and mootness are two concepts not all that readily associated with litigation. If a case exists, it should be ready to adjudicate, no? If someone has been damaged, then the case cannot be moot? We see one such example in GREENSTREET FINANCIAL, L.P., -against- CS-GRACES, LLC, et al., Defendants. CS-GRACES, LLC, et al.,07 Civ.
Who Owes the Duty in Legal Malpractice?
An auto accident. Severe injuries. A multi-million dollar settlement. Is that the end of the story? TOKYO MARINE AND NICHIDO FIRE INSURANCE CO., LTD., as subrogee for Mitsubishi Motors Credit of America, Inc., Plaintiff, -against- ROSALIE CALABRESE and LOUIS FACCIPONTI, Defendants. ROSALIE CALABRESE and LOUIS FACCIPONTI, Third-Party Plaintiffs, -against- RUSSO & APOZNANSKI, and MONTFORT, HEALY, …