This case discusses three important concepts in legal malpractice.  Standing, immunity  and proximate cause. Cangro v. Solimon  2008 Slip Op. 33345. holds that  under Rule 1(h) of Part 36 of the Rules of the Chief Judge, a guardian ad litem’s attorney requires judicial appointment, and is immune from suit, absent permission from the court. The same is

Asbestos settlements have changed the landscape of tort law, and especially mass tort law.  Back in the mid ’90s asbestos cases started to cascade and overwhelm the system.  The defense bar’s response was to try to streamline the process.  While this may seem counter intuitive, the intersection between defense costs and settlement costs, especially when

The question of when a legal malpractice claim belongs to the debtor and when it belongs to the debtor’s estate is of strong significance.  If the former, plaintiff may hire his own attorney and proceed; if the latter, then the trustee in bankruptcy or debtor’s estate holds the reins.  Here, from Bankruptcy Law Network