This holiday season has been one long story about bad economic news, swindles, bad investments, and hedge funds.  One meme of this blog has been that legal malpractice litigation is ubiquitous, and intertwined with all aspects of our world.  This is simply a reflection of the integration of law and lawyers in all aspects of

Arbitration and legal malpractice form an uneasy fit.  One reason is that discovery is limited; another is that the case is decided by a panel of attorneys.  While in many ways a panel of "wise men" may be preferable, in legal malpractice plaintiff will generally prefer a jury.

Juries trend towards a less highly technical

It was always a first year economy class aphorism that hemlines were positively correlated with the state of the economy.  Better finances led to brighter prospects, led to more sprightly dresses, with higher hemlines.  A downturn in the economy leads to a similar sartorial downturn.

This article from NY Lawyer  "As Economy Worsens, More Lawyers Being

This is the same heading, but relates to a totally different set of circumstances.  Is an attorney/law firm united in interest with its former client, when the former client is sued, but the attorney is not?  May plaintiff [or a third-party plaintiff] rely upon the relation-back principal in order to bring in the attorneys late

Legal Malpractice litigation succeed es earlier litigation, by its very definition, and all know that "but for" refers to the first case.  An unfortunate corollary to this definitional fact is that clients and some attorneys turn to legal malpractice litigation as a default mode of trying to rectify all wrongs, whether caused by the attorney