This difficult and tragic medical malpractice – bankruptcy – legal malpractice case is worth studying. on the issues of bankruptcy stays and equitable estoppel,

Not once but twice plaintiff has been non-suited based upon the statute of limitations. The underlying claim is that she was subjected to unnecessary bi-lateral mastectomy

Plaintiff’s medical malpractice case was started

It’s often surprising, when reading a newly published case, at the wide difference between plaintiff’s take on the case, and the defense presented by his former attorneys.  The attorneys, who just a short period earlier had been plaintiff’s paragons, now have a diametrically opposed viewpoint.  Sometimes it may be justified.  Here is a newly published

This seems to be a new twist.  It dovetails with our earlier discussions of  new venues in legal malpractice, and cases being brought against lawyers by persons other than their clients.  Here, former opponents sue the attorneys after bargaining with the bankrupt client and obtaining communications between bankrupt client and its attorney.  Now:

"Eager to