Plaintiff wanted to sue his opponent’s attorneys. While the ability to sue your opponent’s attorney is very restricted, [see: lack of privity}, in certain circumstances it is possible. This case:

Blum v Perlstein
2008 NY Slip Op 00439
Decided on January 22, 2008
Appellate Division, Second Department

appears to stand for the proposition that plaintiff

In a familiar setting, this time the case is receiver v. former attorney.  Other times it is bankruptcy trustee v. attorney.  Southwest Exchange, a former Nevada financial company involved in litigation and in receivership ended 2007 owing $98 million to 130 real estate investors.

Now, in this familiar setting the receiver is suing the law firm of

Decedents, Estates, Administrators, Lawsuits.  This area of legal malpractice is extraordinarily twisted and difficult when asserting privity.  Take for example the question of an executor suing the decedent’s attorney [who prepared the will] or the estate’s attorney [who offered the will for probate.]  They are not necessarily the same person, and different statutes of limitation

Chicago Business Litigation Lawyer Blog reports that a huge class action legal malpractice case against DLA Piper Rudnick has been dismissed.  Plaintiff’s and defendants had entered into a tolling agreement that was amended and went on for several years.  This case was valued at over $ 19 million dollars.  After several amendments of the tolling agreement