Motions to dismiss under CPLR 3211(a)(5) are often made in legal malpractice cases. One reason is that there is often a long latency period between the mistake and its surfacing. This latency period regularly leads to cases that are brought more than 3 years after the mistake. The continuous representation principal allows a plaintiff 3
Legal Malpractice News
Hearsay Alone Cannot Support a Legal Malpractice Case
Plaintiff hears that a settlement offer had been made, and knows that his attorney did not convey a settlement offer. We all know that it can be malpractice for an attorney to fail to convey a settlement offer, so long as Plaintiff would have taken the offer. So, is this legal malpractice?
Not here, in…
It’s Pure Speculation Whether Anyone Could Save the Day
Defendant A handles a case, and defects in service take place. Successor counsel has about 6 months until the statute lapses. Defendant 1 moves for dismissal. Defendant 2 opposes. Was there enough time for Defendant 2 to fix the problems, and if so, is Defendant 1 excused?
Grant v LaTrace 2014 NY Slip Op…
Who Was At Fault Here?
Plaintiff blames the attorney and the attorney blames the client. Someone was at fault for not appearing in court for the trial of this case. A motion to vacate fails. Was it because the motion was badly written, or because plaintiff-client had no excuse for the default?
Di Giacomo v Langella 2014 NY Slip…
Differences Between Tort and Contract in Legal Malpractice
Legal malpractice claims are often stated in both tort and in contract, and the general feeling is that a contract cause of action in legal malpractice will almost always be a duplicitive or disguised tort claim that warrants dismissal.
Not so inState of N.Y. Workers’ Compensation Bd. v Madden 2014 NY Slip Op…
Was He My Attorney and How Did This Happen?
Mizrahi v Adler 2014 NY Slip Op 31701(U) June 30, 2014 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: 650802/2010 Judge: O. Peter Sherwood is the rather sad story of a man and his attorney, who both took a Las Vegas detour into Trump real estate hell. Whether the attorney was a fellow traveler, or was…
Entity Stays in Case, Individuals Out of Legal Malpractice Case
Privity, a requirement rather unique to legal malpractice cases in tort, is the reason that the individuals in this case are out, while the entity remains in the case. It had privity, but they did not. Leggiadro, Ltd. v Winston & Strawn, LLP 2014 NY Slip Op 05048 Decided on July 3, 2014
Appellate Division…
Is This Legal Malpractice In Contract or Is It A Tort?
We have recently written about the conversion of legal malpractice from a tort to a contact action, and some of the changes that have been occasioned. Here, in Salazar v Sacco & Fillas, LLP
2014 NY Slip Op 00980 [114 AD3d 745] February 13, 2014 Appellate Division, Second Department the Court goes to some length…
July 4th
We’re off celebrating. Have a great 4th of July!
The Rare Legal Malpractice Case Lacking Privity
It is very very rare, but here is a case in ""the narrow exception of fraud, collusion, malicious acts or other special circumstances" under which a cause of action alleging attorney malpractice may be asserted absent a showing of privity (Ginsburg Dev. Cos., LLC v Carbone, 85 AD3d 1110, 1112 [2011]"
Mr. San, LLC v …