Rochester: The Fourth Department heard this case once, and sent it back to Oneida County. Supreme Court dismissed it once again, and the Fourth Department has once again sent it back to Oneida County for trial.Dischiavi v Calli 2013 NY Slip Op 07289 [111 AD3d 1258] November 8, 2013 Appellate Division, Fourth
Legal Malpractice News
No Continuous Representation? No Case!
Albany / Syracuse:
The statute of limitations exists so that the courts can carry on. Were it not for the S/L, courts would still be delving into wrongs that took place before World War 2. Legal malpractice has a 3 year statute of limitations, which is somewhat ameliorated by the continuous representation doctrine. So…
Mistakes May Be Shown But That’s Just The First Step
Albany: The Third Department decided the matter of Hyman v Schwartz 2014 NY Slip Op 01362 [114 AD3d 1110] February 27, 2014 Appellate Division, Third Department and found that although a plethora of mistakes could be pled in the complaint, no prima facie case of legal malpractice could be stated. Why? The complaint simply could…
Is It Legal Malpractice Not To Answer A Legal Malpractice Complaint?
Defendant attorney is served with a "bare" summons and complaint. He sends it on to his carrier.He defines a "bare" summons and complaint as one which does not have an index number, filing date or basis of venue. Carrier appoints a defense attorney who tries to call the plaintiff’s attorney, all to no avail. Motion…
Negotiation Is Not Necessarily Deceit
Judiciary Law 487 is a deceit statute. It reads: " § 487. Misconduct by attorneys. An attorney or counselor who:
1. Is guilty of any deceit or collusion, or consents to any deceit or
collusion, with intent to deceive the court or any party; or,
2. Wilfully delays his client’s suit with a view to…
The Evidence of Legal Malpractice Just Keeps Appearing
When you start reading Blanco v Polanco 2014 NY Slip Op 02735 Decided on April 23, 2014 Appellate Division, Second Department it seems to be a simple case. Buyers purchase a house, and don’t do an inspection. They get a punch list, and then discover that the upstairs apartment does not have a Certificate of…
When The Dude Ranch Deal Goes South, Blame the Attorney
SS Marks LLC v Morrison Cohen LLP 2014 NY Slip Op 31030(U) April 16, 2014 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 650049/2009 Judge: O. Peter Sherwood is an example of how a likely sounding legal malpractice case can be lost on a series of e-mails. Here, plaintiff’s plausible claims are completely undone by…
Franchisee Loses Drug Store Case and Loses Attorney Fee Case
Attorney is hired to defend a case. What is the standard of care if the case is "unwinnable"? Justice Jaffe of Supreme Court, New York County discusses what happens when a franchisee who has signed personal guarantees falls behind in royalty payments to the franchisor. It’s not pretty.
In Pu v Mitsopoulos 2014 NY Slip…
A Short Letter to the Client Would Have Made a World of Difference
Was it strategy or mistake? Was the Warning given or not? Was the Attorney negligent or did he do a good job? These are the questions that are daily raised in legal malpractice cases. Sometimes, as in Mateo v Silver & Silver, LLP 2014 NY Slip Op 30986(U) April 15, 2014
Supreme Court, New York…
Try As They Might, Summary Judgment Just Isn’t There
We believe that a greater proportion of legal malpractice cases are subject to motions for summary judgment, and that more decisions to dismiss are granted than in other specialties. In Kempf v Magida 2014 NY Slip Op 02410 Decided on April 9, 2014 Appellate Division, Second Department the merely unusual happened. Summary judgment was…