Plaintiff sues law firm, which represented his former employer after he failed to get them to file a corrected opinion letter to facilitate removal of restrictive legends on his stock certificate. The mistake was in the opinion letter where the law firm mistakenly said it represented "Plaintiff" rather than the employer.

The Appellate Division affirms Judge

Plaintiff is a 50% shareholder in a lucrative franchise operation, and at the end of a contract term both he and the entire franchise is faced with a difficult franchisor, which wants to upset the arrangement.  An attorney is hired, and not only does the eventual franchisor-franchisee litigation end badly, but the individual plaintiff is advised to

A recurring theme in defense-side publications in the legal malpractice field is the connection between attorney fee collection suits and subsequent legal malpractice counter-claims.  For us, its a chicken-egg issue.  Is the legal malpractice case a shameless effort to avoid payment, or did the non-payment arise because there was poor performance (read:  legal malpractice)?

We