Not only did the defendants obtain dismissal, but the non-answering defendant obtained dismissal too. Unfortunately the 2d Department decision in Siwiec v Rawlins 2013 NY Slip Op 00903 Decided on February 13, 2013 Appellate Division, Second Department did not explain its reasoning. The most that can be gleaned from this slender record is "Here, the complaint
Legal Malpractice News
What Did Plaintiff Know, and When did He Know It?
Plaintiff loses in Supreme Court, and dismissal is affirmed in the Appellate Division in this legal malpractice case. Voutsas v Hochberg 2013 NY Slip Op 00803 Decided on February 7, 2013
Appellate Division, First Department discusses the limits of the fraud discovery rule, as well as continuous representation.
"The fraud and breach of contract…
Conseqences of Discovery Failures
Justice Ritholtz of Supreme Court, Queens County lays the issue out in the first sentence of the decision in 150 Centreville, LLC v Lin Assoc. Architects, PC 2013 NY Slip Op 23038 Decided on February 6, 2013 Supreme Court, Queens County Ritholtz, J. "The questions involved in this action are whether there should be any…
A Thoughtful Primer on Evidence and Summary Judgment
It’s medical malpractice which is something we don’t usually write about, but Justice Schlesinger’s opinion in this medical malpractice summary judgment opinion is well worth reading. Balzola v Giese 2013 NY Slip Op 30324(U) February 5, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 114205/2009 Judge: Alice Schlesinger slowly and thoroughly works it way through…
How One Legal Malpractice Plaintiff Lost Twice
Hsu v Liu & Shields LLP 2013 NY Slip Op 30291(U) February 7, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County
Docket Number: 400781/12 Judge: Richard F. Braun is the story of how one set of plaintiffs lost this case twice, in fact three times. Plaintiff is pro-se, and complains that he and other plaintiffs were the…
Two Law Firms and Their Attorneys Fight Over Who’s More Responsible
In Balkheimer v Spanton 2013 NY Slip Op 00715 Decided on February 6, 2013 Appellate Division, Second Department we see two law firms, and their stellar legal malpractice defense attorneys fighting over who is more responsible to plaintiff. In a situation such as this, we see the unusual (but not unprecedented) comedy of legal…
Pryor Cashman, the Coal Company and Legal Billing
The New York Law Journal reports a Pryor Cashman legal malpractice and billing case today. It’s a very big fee, and Judge Schweitzer decides for the law firm today in Pryor Cashman LLP v. U.S. Coal Corporation, Supreme Court, New York County, Index No. 651908/2011.
"Plaintiff Pryor Cashman LLP moves, pursuant to CPLR 32…
Service of Process and the Recalcitrant Security Guard
You want to sue your attorney, and the security guard downstairs won’t let the process server up. The process server goes there several times, and fails to get upstairs. What is one to do?
Miller v Friedman 2013 NY Slip Op 30282(U) January 29, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 400833/12 Judge: Joan…
A Second Bite at the Legal Malpractice Apple
Defendant attorney represented buyer in a real estate transaction, in which she obtained only a part of what she expected to get. Who was at fault, the attorney or the title company? The Court decided that the title company was not responsible and the attorney went to trial. After trial, in which the buyer obtained…
Successive Summary Judgment Motions Not Permitted; Cause of Action Dismissed Anyway
This case appears to be a fee dispute with a healthy counterclaim. We glean that defendants waited until (and perhaps only because) they were sued for legal fees. They responded with a legal malpractice counterclaim. In Debevoise & Plimpton LLP v Candlewood Timber Group LLC
2013 NY Slip Op 00408 Decided on January 29, 2013  …