Plaintiff and a buddy go to attorney to start a business. Attorney is retained, and eventually Plaintiff is the odd-person out. Attorney’s retainer agreement names only the buddy, and even though attorney sends letters to both Plaintiff and buddy, and creates documents which plaintiff and buddy sign, it is Buddy who comes out with 75%

In Hirsch v Fink ; 2011 NY Slip Op 07699 ; Decided on November 1, 2011 ; Appellate Division, First Department  we see an unusual situation.  Attorney-client sues his own attorney after an attorney-based litigation for legal malpractice.  In this particular case plaintiff-attorney loses on res judicata and subsequent attorney grounds.
 

Subsequent attorney grounds

The law of legal malpractice is different; it is ubiquitous.  We see this theme again and again in the published cases.  In products liability law, privity was jettisoned years ago.  It remains in legal malpractice law.  In In re: HIRSCH ELECTRIC CO., INC., Debtor. ALLAN B. MENDELSOHN, as Chapter 7 Trustee of the

Plaintiff buys a house which it says was illegally constructed, and further says that since the seller worked for Oyster Bay, the town overlooked illegal construction and gave a Certificate of Occupancy.  This action, JULIE LAMOTHE and JUSTIN LAMOTHE, Plaintiffs, -against- THE TOWN OF OYSTER BAY, THE TOWN OF OYSTER BAY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING