In a short year end decision, no one wins a summary judgment decision.  This stand-off clearly favors plaintiff, which now enters the new year with a trial to be had.  In Security Plans, Inc. v Harter Secrest & Emery, LLP
2021 NY Slip Op 07382 Decided on December 23, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department told

A frequently recurring situation in legal malpractice cases is that plaintiff retains lawfirm in a medical malpractice case, and very shortly before the statute of limitations date, the lawfirm bows out. They quit, often because they have been unwilling or unable to fund an expert, whose review is necessary prior to filing the complaint.  Legal

Generally speaking, fraud claims in a legal malpractice setting are dismissed as duplicitive of the legal malpractice claim.  For years, litigants have used the longer statute of limitations period for fraud as a way around a stale legal malpractice claim along with a discovery onset of the statute.  In addition, fraud allows for greater damage

We believe that a legal malpractice case based upon a medical malpractice underlying case may be amongst the most technically and procedurally challenging litigations that exist.  Proving a medical malpractice claim (as a plaintiff) is very difficult.  It requires a strong understanding of medicine, massive record discovery, use of specialist medical experts, depositions of physicians,