In a short year end decision, no one wins a summary judgment decision. This stand-off clearly favors plaintiff, which now enters the new year with a trial to be had. In Security Plans, Inc. v Harter Secrest & Emery, LLP
2021 NY Slip Op 07382 Decided on December 23, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department told
Uncategorized
Was The Fee Greater Than The Retainer Allowed?
Wilson v Tully Rinckey PLLC 2021 NY Slip Op 07341 Decided on December 23, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department is a fairly straight-forward affirmance of Supreme Court’s denial of a CPLR 3211 motion. Here are the simple reasons why the legal malpractice claims were not dismissed. Plaintiff sued for employment discrimination and thought that part…
Always Remind the Court that You Are An Attorney
As a trial document, Outeda v Asensio 2021 NY Slip Op 51069(U) [73 Misc 3d 136(A)] Decided on November 5, 2021 Appellate Term, Second Department is a little surprising. It’s an attorney fee trial over $ 10,000. The decision catalogues what went wrong, some of it easily avoidable. Read both dissents in the full version.…
What Happens When the Med Mal Attorney Bows Out?
A frequently recurring situation in legal malpractice cases is that plaintiff retains lawfirm in a medical malpractice case, and very shortly before the statute of limitations date, the lawfirm bows out. They quit, often because they have been unwilling or unable to fund an expert, whose review is necessary prior to filing the complaint. Legal…
Selecting Certain Providers Can Support Legal Malpractice
While negligent selection of experts has been rejected as a legal malpractice claim many times on the explanation that selection of experts is a strategy choice, in Moncho v Miller 2021 NY Slip Op 06960
Decided on December 14, 2021, Appellate Division, First Department determined that selection of a litigation funder can be the basis…
Here Are The Basics of a Legal Malpractice Claim
Rudovic v Law Off. of Timothy A. Green 2021 NY Slip Op 06873 Decided on December 8, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department states the bedrock principles upon which a good legal malpractice is based. How they apply to the underlying case is left to the reader’s imagination. The Appellate Bench would aid the legal malpractice…
The Court Reverses Itself on a Legal Malpractice Decision
It is not often that a court allows reargument, states that it misapplied the law, and reverses itself as took place in Orlando v Robinson Brog Leinwand Greene Genovese & Gluck, P.C. 2021 NY Slip Op 32235(U)
November 9, 2021 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 155048/2020 Judge: Phillip Hom. However,…
The Rare Fraud Cause of Action in Legal Malpractice
Generally speaking, fraud claims in a legal malpractice setting are dismissed as duplicitive of the legal malpractice claim. For years, litigants have used the longer statute of limitations period for fraud as a way around a stale legal malpractice claim along with a discovery onset of the statute. In addition, fraud allows for greater damage…
Discovery Lapse Dooms Case
Allstar Elecs., Inc. v DeLuca 2020 NY Slip Op 07018 [188 AD3d 1121]
November 25, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department demonstrates the danger of discovery failures. Here, the entire case was dismissed over the failure to give what the Court termed a “failure to provide court-ordered discovery.”
“”The nature and degree of the penalty to…
A Pro-se Adrift in Very Challenging Seas
We believe that a legal malpractice case based upon a medical malpractice underlying case may be amongst the most technically and procedurally challenging litigations that exist. Proving a medical malpractice claim (as a plaintiff) is very difficult. It requires a strong understanding of medicine, massive record discovery, use of specialist medical experts, depositions of physicians,…