OK, so the client comes into the office, and you think you might take the case. Then, after further thought, you think you might not take the case. What do you do? How do you do it? Lindsay v Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP 2015 NY Slip Op 04819 Decided on June
Uncategorized
Why This Was Not Still A Question of Fact is A Mystery to Us
Dawson v Schoenberg 2015 NY Slip Op 04603 Decided on June 3, 2015 Appellate Division, Second Department is the sister case to Dawson which we discussed yesterday. As is well settled, in a legal malpractice case against a former defense attorney, plaintiff must demonstrate that the conviction “was due to the attorney’s actions alone and…
Legal Fee Litigation Leads to a Twisted Mess
Gelwan v Youni Gems Corp. 2015 NY Slip Op 30916(U) June 2, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 653656/2013 Judge: Manuel J. Mendez is an example of how much time and effort attorneys are willing to put into their own fee dispute cases. Here the dispute is over a contingent fee in a…
$ 9.2 Million is Lost on an Invention; Not the Attorney’s Fault
Melnick v Farrell 2015 NY Slip Op 03658 Decided on May 1, 2015 Appellate Division, Fourth Department is an interesting case about upstate inventors, selling an invention to another company, protection in a future bankruptcy proceedings, and how a multi-million dollar asset can be lost without attorney malpractice.
“Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this legal malpractice action…
Johnson & Johnson Heirs v. Proskauer Rose LLP…The Numbers are Huge
Johnson v Proskauer Rose LLP 2015 NY Slip Op 03626 Decided on April 30, 2015 Appellate Division, First Department Mazzarelli, J., J. is the story of heirs who are seduced into an expensive tax avoidance scheme, only to lose millions. Whose fault is it? Is the story merely greedy heirs, or is it fraud by…
Is the Statute for Judiciary Law 487 Three Years or Six Years?
The Court of Appeals said that the statute of limitations for Judiciary Law § 487 is six years in Melcher v Greenberg Traurig, LLP 23 NY3d 10. Thus, even if a claim for attorney deceit originated in the first Statute of Westminster rather than preexisting English common law (a question unresolved by Amalfitano and disputed…
It’s A Short Statute of Limitations and Is Rarely Circumvented
Plaintiffs attempted to bring a legal malpractice action after three years had elapsed, and relied upon pleadings which cited “fraud.” The Appellate Division reminded all that there is no real circumvention of the statute of limitations, and that the fraud has to be extrinsic to the attorney-client relationship.
An Explosion, A Fire, A Legal Malpractice Case
Client owns a gas station. A dump truck and a fuel truck collide and explode. The station is closed for 5 years while remediation of the fuel spill goes on. They sue the trucks, and lose. Was this legal malpractice?
This case appears to be the first application of Grace v. Law in which the…
The Shortest Appellate Division Decision of the Month
In a short and cryptic decision, the First Department affirmed dismissal of a legal malpractice case. Evart v Shapiro, Beilly & Aronowitz, LLP 2015 NY Slip Op 02847 Decided on April 2, 2015 Appellate Division, First Department consists of just two sentences. Really only one counts.
“The motion court properly dismissed plaintiff’s legal malpractice claims,…
Legal Malpractice and the Bulk Sale of Assets
OK, so you want to buy a business. The best advice is to get an experienced attorney, no? What happens when the attorney fails to follow the directions of Tax Law § 1141(c)? That section of the tax law is the bulk sales law, and it says that the purchaser must contact the Tax Department…