You don’t get much more tabloid than this. Michael Jackson responds to an attorney fee case with a legal malpractice defense. His claim? “Michael Jackson Sues Former Lawyers

October 17, 2006 7:27 p.m. EST

Josephine Roque – All Headline News Staff Writer
Los Angeles, California (AHN) – Michael Jackson is charging his former attorneys for

It seems that the attorney here is the only innocent party. A phony law firm, fake lawyers, and lots of money stolen. “Family Admits Bilking $14 Million Through Phony Law Firm

Four members of a Staten Island family have pleaded guilty in connection with charges that they cheated homeowners and investors of $14 million in

Phen-Fen litigation gave rise to a big big fund. $200 million settled the case, but here the lawyers held onto about $126 million.”About 400 people should receive nearly $20 million held in a controversial fund controlled by three Lexington, Ky., lawyers in a lawsuit over the diet drug fen-phen, a judge has ruled.

Special Judge

Good cause for termination is not the same as malpractice. Attorney malpractice, the deviation from good and accepted practice, which proximately damaged the party, in which, but for the negligence of the attorney there would have been a different or better result is not the same as good cause for termination. Termination for cause has

“The first stone” analysis in this case is facinating. Legal malpractice action brought because plaintiff believed his prisioner beating municipal case was time barred. His attys did not bring the action at all. In Legal Malpractice case Judge now dismissed, saying:
“While, generally, suit must be initiated against a municipality and its agencies within one