Its a shortened blog blip, and it seems that the original path to the decision is corrupt, but here is the story: “State law precluded excess insurer’s legal malpractice suit against attorneys who represented insured in personal injury suit; insurer lacked privity with attorneys and thus by statute could not assert claim for legal malpractice,

Carolyn Elefant brings this beauty to us in Law.Com: Attorney files notice of appeal, Appellate Court tells him there is an error in filing, he looks at his copy [and not the actual copy which was filed] and decided that there was no error. Who was wrong ? Attorney. Who suffers? Client. Details.

Attorney puts down 10:00 a.m. for a hearing, when it is set for 9:00 a.m. Legal Malpractice? See this case. It will cost one attorney $ 70,000 per hour for lateness. “O’Connor, who said he has filed his own motion disputing Narvaez’s request to negate the default judgment, said being late to a hearing amounts

Here is a case which turns on whether the plaintiff’s claims against his attorney would be pre-empted by federal ERISA law. The attorney was retained to bring an action against insurers, and failed. Now, when the attorney is sued, he claims that the entire case, including that against him, is precluded and preempted by ERISA.

Even though the underlying action was dismissed because the defendant attorney failed to provide discovery, even after several chances, this legal malpractice case was dismissed. Reading this case provides a good look at how hard legal malpractice cases can be. Since plaintiff has to prove the “case within a case” one needs a virtual trifecta: