Tampa now has a self-help law shop.  What they sell is somewhat unclear, but it appears that they sell kits for wills, and other simple legal transactions.  Previously, they tried to help with a dental malpractice, only to fall short and be fined.  Will legal malpractice self-help kits be next?  The article.

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP  reports an Ohio Collectability case.  Here, no reduction for uncollectability.  Ohio Appellate Court Rejects Collectability in Underlying Case as Limit on Recovery in Legal Malpractice Action

Paterek v. Peterson & Ibold, 2006 WL 2337483 (Ohio App. 11 Dist. 2006)

In this 2-1 appellate court decision, the majority held that the trial court had improperly reduced a legal malpractice verdict resulting from a blown statute of limitations on the ground that the amount of the legal malpractice verdict exceeded what would have been collectible from the underlying tort defendant and his insurer.

Click on the link to view the full Alert or visit the following internet address:
http://www.hinshawlaw.com/knowledge/alert_detail.aspx?id=1013&type=5303

Plaintiff loses employment discrimination case due to legal malpractice.  Bad so far?  Plaintiff sues her attorney.  Her attorney defaults on discovery responsbilities, defaults on appearances, generally tries to screw around.  Plaintiff gets default judgment against attorney.  Getting a little better?

Attorney suffers default judgment and files bankruptcy.  Held, in this case, the default judgment is dischargeable, and plaintiff takes nothing.  A nightmare.