1st prize Technology Innovation:
$10,00 HP Business store award
Andrew Lavoott Bluestone, Bluestone Law Firm, New York, NY

Winning solution: Andrew Bluestone, a sole practitioner in New York City, concentrates in legal malpractice litigation. One of his biggest challenges is managing thousands of documents for each case. To deal with this, he scans every piece of paper that comes to his office, as well as articles and legal research – over four million pages thus far – using two HP flatbed scanners and one HP handheld scanner. This enables him to store, recover, transmit, analyze and refer to vast files right from his desk, thanks to a central document database, and litigation support software. A wired network connects eight PCs in the office used by Bluestone and his secretary. Documents and case notes are accessible at any workstation from a central file server. An HP iPAQ Pocket PC and HP business notebook PC help him manage the same tasks away from the office.

While other attorneys are storing paper in files, going to the files to read documents, and keeping the documents nearby, Bluestone is storing millions of pages digitally and reading files right from his computer screen. He even has a display permanently set up in portrait so the pages are life-size. He can flick through a 200pp transcript just like having it on his desk, not to mention being able to annotate, print, select and work with the document in many digital ways. Other firms still copy and ship paper documents for a document discovery response, but Bluestone writes documents to CD for mailing, saving him anywhere from $50 to $350 in photocopying costs plus $35 per delivery. Bluestone says he couldn’t maintain his practice if he had to physically find a paper document to read it. Nor could he store all the documents in his office; he would have to rent an additional office to store some 450 boxes of paper. HP products make the difference.

Tom Perotain the New York Law Journal writes of a facinating lawyer on lawyer fight before a special referee.

This is a legal malpractice on a legal malpractice arising from a matrimonial case. Apparently the client went to a malpractice attorney before her matrimonial action was over, and then was disadvantaged because the matrimonial attorney would not give up the file.

Stife and litigation ensued between W.Robert Curtis and David Bushman then battled over whether the client owed her matrimonial attorney about $ 28,000 in fees.

The bizarre special referee’s hearing lasted for weeks, ending with a finding that the matrimonial attorney had suborned perjury, and with Curtis unsuccessfully asking for about $ 400,000 in fees.

The result? It seems that everyone loses. The matrimonial attorney doesn’t get paid and is found to have suborned perjury. Curtis doesn’t get paid. The client apparently did not get custody of her children.

Here are some experts from the story: Continue Reading Legal Malpractice Attorneys Fight amongst Themselves

“Attorneys Rendering Incorrect Advice on Statute of Limitations Subject to Malpractice Liability Despite Viability of Underlying Action at the Time of Withdrawal” is a new report by Hinshaw & Culbertson. Their e-mailed article describes an Illinois case. This was a twisted series of attorney-client meetings and advice that the statute was 2 years rathern than the correct 1 year.

I was leafing through a dog-eared advance sheets and came across this well written Supreme Court case authored by Justice Rolando T. Acosta, which discusses the breadth of discovery permitted by defendant attorneys of successor attorneys once a legal malpractice action is started. Continue Reading Legal Malpractice, Disclosure, Privilege and the “at Issue” Doctrine

The New York Attorney Malpractice Blog and Andrew Lavoott Bluestone has been awarded First Place in the Hewlett Packard Law Technology contest for its innovation over this past year.

The award is for the use of digital technology at the Bluestone Law Firm and in the Blog. The New York Attorney Blog uses LexBlog to reach its readers