We have all been faced with a motion that is not so well written or supported.  This case,Root v Brotmann, 2007 NY Slip Op 05353 ,Decided on June 19, 2007 ,Appellate Division, First Department  illustrates the principal that its not right to file deficient papers, and then try to paper over the holes with

This report of proceedings in the Qualcomm case is the exception to the rule of making no admission absent a gun to the head.  At stake are attorney fees in a huge patent case.

"“Lawyers can make mistakes,” said Bill Boggs, Qualcomm’s new lead attorney in the case.
He explained how the San Diego company

Quinn Emanuel reports this case:  In a federal legal malpractice and section 1983 case, plaintiff’s attorney asked deposition questions of defendant which were intended to harass.  Defendant’s attorney told his client not to answer, and ran afoul of the 7th circuit.  They said he should have walked out and moved for a protective order.

"During

Calendar dismissals are a vivid demonstration of how a case goew wrong.  There are pre-note and post-note of issue instances.  Here is a well written article which discusses pre-note dismissals by William Greenberg

"Now two recent cases from the Appellate Division, Second Department may have lent some clarity. These cases – Travis v. Cuff, 28

Daniel Wise at the NYLJ reports that two judges abruptly left the bench yesterday:

"Justice Resigns Amid Reported Probe

Supreme Court Justice Lawrence I. Horowitz (See Profile) abruptly resigned from the bench yesterday, according Ninth Judicial District Administrative Judge Francis A. Nicolai (See Profile). Justice Horowitz, 56, who has reportedly been under investigation for intervening