Yesterday we published a story about a legal malpractice and mediation which has been widely reported. Plaintiff claimed that the attorney negligently lowered a settlement demand, which damaged it.  Discovery of the mediation discussions was not permitted.  Today we have a comment from one of the attorneys:

"A comment from counsel for Wimsatt:

This case, reported today is a dismissal of legal malpractice because the attorneys represented the company, and not the individual plaintiff shareholders.

"As a threshold matter, in order to establish a cause of action for legal malpractice, the plaintiff must demonstrate the existence of an attorney-client relationship (AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v. State

The Court of Appeals has found in Rivera v Anilesh ,2007 NY Slip Op 05134 , Decided on June 12,  2007 , that a dentist’s habit [his regular procedure] of injecting anesthetic, is admissible to show lack of negligence.

"In this malpractice action by a patient against her dentist, we are asked whether the dentist’s

Misconduct of a partner led to this verdict yesterday.  The jury found that partner Henry I. Rothman abandoned a three person partnership, staying with only one of the partners.

This case started as a legal fee matter in Civil Court!!   Parker Chapin then saw a counterclaim for legal malpractice. "The jury awarded $2 million in compensatory