In a well-reasoned opinion from the SDNY, Judge Koeltl determined that plaintiff may continue with three claims against the attorneys. In SMARTIX INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a.k.a. SMARTIX INTERNATIONAL, LLC, – against – GARRUBBO, ROMANKOW & CAPESE, P.C. AND ANTHONY RINALDO, 6 Civ. 1501 (JGK); UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; 2009 U.S.
Legal Malpractice News
What Creates an Attorney-Client Relationship for Legal Malpractice Purposes ?
Privity of contract is an essential in legal malpractice litigation. One may not sue the opponent’s attorney; only one’s own. What makes for privity of contract? As all know, no writing is necessary to create a contract. So, can there be privity of contract without a retainer agreement. Putting aside Rule 137 questions about the…
Attorney and Client Battle over Fees and Legal Malpractice
So often, the practice of law seems to have devolved into an attorney v. client battle over the work and fees. Here in Morelli & Gold LLP v. Altman, NY Slip Op 31492(U) we see a large scale battle over a child support/custody case in which there has been litigation, fees, fee dispute, trial de novo…
Attorney’s Representation and Comments not Legal Malpractice
Legal Malpractice litigation is a world apart from the rest of regular litigation ; it has its own rules, it has its own prinicipals, and is the sole set of rules written by attorneys to regulate attorneys. Criminal legal malpractice is a world within a world…not unlike a russian doll set.
Here, in a Federal District…
“Unsettled Law” and Legal Malpractice
Attorneys deal in areas of well settled law and in areas of "unsettled law." Clients have problems or issues which exist, no matter how settled the law is in that area. Attorneys are held to a standard of reasonable care in all aspects of their representation. How does one square these contradictory settings?
An answer…
Privity and Lack of Proximity in Legal Malpractice
In Weksler v Kane Kessler, P.C. ;2009 NY Slip Op 04957 ;Decided on June 16, 2009 ;Appellate Division, First Department we see the fatal duo of lack of privity and lack of proximity. The short story is that Plaintiff, while married to decedent was promised a life-long annuity of $ 4000 per month, said to…
When is a Helicopter Crash Like Legal Malpractice?
The short answer is when there is spoliation. Spoliation is the intentional or negligent destruction of evidence. It may take place prior to, or during litigation, and it always deprives one side of the use of otherwise admissible evidence.
In the helicopter case, it seems to have been intentional. IN RE HELICOPTER CRASH NEAR WENDLE …
Res Judicata and Bankruptcy Fee Hearings
We have commented about the Collateral Estoppel trap in legal malpractice with regard to fee arbitrations and hearings. in short, when a court grants an attorney fee application, it implicitly determines that there can have been no malpractice, as the court may not award fees in the face of malpractice. Fee arbitrations and hearings in…
Matrimonial Legal Malpractice, Fees and Summary Judgment
Clients often ask whether it matters that their legal malpractice case comes as a defense to an attorney fee case. It should not, but judges are swayed by the procedural setting of cases before them. Does it make a difference whether the legal malpractice case is a main action or a counterclaim? Taking a look…
Documentary Evidence and the Motion to Dismiss in Legal Malpractice
CPLR 3211 (a)(1) is the "documentary evidence" portion of a general pre-answer motion to dismiss. The standard applied to dismissal motions under this particular sub-section is:
"On a motion to dismiss based upon documentary evidence, dismissal is only warranted if the documentary evidence submitted conclusively establishes a defense to the asserted claims as a matter…