Continuing a trend for bankruptcy/referee/trustee/ unusual settings for legal malpractice litigation, here is an article from NY Lawyer about the settlement of a large legal malpractice "disentanglement" case:

"Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati has paid $9.5 million to Brocade Communications Systems to release itself — as well its chairman and former Brocade board member, Larry

Yesterday we reported on a Nebraska case in which it was found that simply because a legal malpractice case came from a patent matter, it was not a federal question, sufficient for US District Court jurisdiction.

Now, hot on the heels, is this case: Singh v. Duane Morris, No. 07-20321.  We’ll get the decision, but

Jurisdiction in Federal District Court…harks back to the first few weeks of law school.  Well, there’s diversity…and…and federal question.  So, a legal malpractice case arising from a patent transaction…state court or federal district court?

Many the removed case has been found to have federal jurisdiction, but this Nebraska Case says that it may be brought

Criminal Defense practitioners enjoy a special dispensation in the legal malpractice world.  Plaintiff there must be able to allege [in New York] actual innocence.  One need not allege freedom from wrong in the civil end of things.

In Hitham Abuhouran, Plaintiff-Appellant, -v.- Asher E. Lans, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

06-2857-pr UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR

In this Bankruptcy-Legal Malpractice Case In re Monahan Ford Corp. of Flushing, Debtor. Richard J. McCord, as Chapter 7 Trustee of the Estate of Monahan Ford Corp. of Flushing, Plaintiff -against- Jaspan Schlesinger Hoffman, LLP, Defendant.

Case No. 02-23134-CEC, Chapter 7, Adv. Pro. No. 04-1496-CEC

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW