Veras Investment Partners, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Defendant-Respondent.

3812N, 600340/07

SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT

2008 NY Slip Op 5563;
June 19, 2008, Decided

The court granted a motion by defendants requiring plaintiffs to divulge attorney client discussions ‘granting defendant’s motion for

MITCHELL PHILLIPS AND DALE PHILLIPS, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v MORAN & KUFTA, P.C., JOSEPH J. MORAN, ESQ., RICHARD J. KUFTA, ESQ., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, ET AL., DEFENDANT.

718 CA 07-02711

SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT

2008 NY Slip Op 6025;
July 3, 2008, Decided

JUDGES: PRESENT: SCUDDER , P.J., HURLBUTT , SMITH , GREEN

NY Lawyer [and Law.com] report that Linklaters is being sued for $55 million in "one of the largest cases against a top U.K. law firm in recent times.

The Magic Circle firm is preparing for a 20-day trial in the High Court next January over claims it gave negligent advice to Baltic telecoms company Levicom.

As part of the "but for" rule, a hypothetical judgment which plaintiff would have won, except for the attorney’s mistake, is the measure of damages in legal malpractice. We have written about this in the New York Law Journal. [4/20/07] The defense of collectibility is that even if successful in the case below, plaintiff would