One of the cornerstones of legal malpractice law is that any hypothetical judgment that plaintiff should have received must have been collectible. If defendant had filed a bankruptcy petition, or there was no insurance and no assets, then any hypothetical judgment that the attorneys did not obtain would not have been collectible, hence, there are
Legal Malpractice News
To Consolidate or Not to Consolidate in Legal Malpractice
Consolidation or a joint trial are subject to judicial discretion. Judges are said to be the master of their calendar, and the Appellate Division rarely steps in and rearranges it. Here, inCounty of Westchester v White Plains Ave., LLC 2013 NY Slip Op 02212 Decided on April 3, 2013
Appellate Division, Second Department consolidation…
Attorneys Break Up, But The Fee Lives On
Wiggins v Kopko 2013 NY Slip Op 02312 Decided on April 4, 2013 Appellate Division, Third Department is a primer on attorney fees, contingent fees and what happens when the firm breaks up with the client and with itself.
"Kopko contends that plaintiff was discharged for cause due to alleged misconduct in his…
Fee Disputes, Legal Malpractice and Part 137
New York has a very comprehensive attorney fee-dispute arbitration process, detailed under 22 NYCRR 137. When does it apply, and how does a legal malpractice claim affect its application?
Wenig Saltiel, LLP v Secord 2013 NY Slip Op 23104 Decided on March 29, 2013 Appellate Term, Second Department is a nicely detailed explanation. Law firm…
Moral Obligations and Legal Malpractice
The essentials of legal malpractice litigation, including standing and ascertainable pecuniary loss come up over and over in the Appellate Division cases. Young v Quatela 2013 NY Slip Op 02243
Decided on April 3, 2013 Appellate Division, Second Department is an example. Plaintiff’s father either suffered the loss or paid for it, and there is…
What is the Statute of Limitations for Disgorgement and Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Breach of Fiduciary Duty has two separate statutes of limitation, six and three years. Which applies in a legal malpractice case? Generally the rule is that the choice of six or three years depends on the substantive remedy sought. If it is for money damages the limit is three years. If for equitable remedy, then…
Is Legal Malpractice a Disfavored Stepchild of the Law?
We wonder whether legal malpractice is treated differently than all other law suits? Fielding v Kupferman 2013 NY Slip Op 02008 Decided on March 26, 2013 Appellate Division, First Department raises the question once again. Compare this case to a garden or varietal slip and fall. Example: plaintiff trips over a defective step and…
Applying the Attorney Judgment Rule to Legal Malpractice Claims
we’re proud to announce that our article on the Attorney Judgment Rule was published by the New York Law Journal today.
"Medicine and law have ancient parallel histories. Each practices self-regulation, and each has developed deep and extensive internal rules of professional conduct. Both have a tentative claim as one of the world’s oldest professions.
Medical Malpractice Followed by Legal Malpractice
Plaintiff is the administratrix of decedent’s estate. This is a very sad story. Decedent entered United Presbyterian Residence after a stroke, and was the victim of a most avoidable problem: pressure ulcer, or more commonly, a bedsore. It eventually, and after much suffering, killed her. Her family hired an attorney to sue the residence, and…
Attorney Sues Attorney; Where is the Client?
Client has a really horrible situation in her apartment. First there is a flood of raw sewerage. She hires law firm 1 to sue. They commence an action. Then, she has a water flood from the neighbor upstairs. She hires law firm 2 to handle that case. They commence an action. Law firm 2 settles the…