Attorneys automatically obtain a charging lien by commencing an action. There are several ways to lose that lien. One is to be terminated "for cause" and another is to withdraw voluntarily. This is different from being "consented out" or by withdrawing with mutual consent. In Nassour v Lutheran Med. Ctr. ;2010 NY Slip Op
Legal Malpractice News
A Primer on All Aspects of Legal Malpractice
For a well written decision on one of the most complicated factual settings we can remember, read Oikonomos, Inc. v Bahrenberg 2013 NY Slip Op 50017(U) Decided on January 5, 2013 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Pines, J. This legal malpractice-breach of fiduciary duty-breach of contract-fraud-promissory estoppel- equitable estoppel case has even more to it. The…
Morally Corrupt and Intellectually Bankrupt Attorney Will Legal Malpractice Follow?
We were unable to select the best of Gerard M. Tanella’s transgressions, and invite you to read the entire list prepared by the Appellate Division in Matter of Tanella 2013 NY Slip Op 00099
Decided on January 9, 2013 Appellate Division, Second Department Per Curiam. which determined his "complete abdication by the respondent of…
What Plaintiff Knew and How it Kills a Legal Malpractice Case
Battling over the "but for" portion of the legal malpractice requirements is generally where commercial cases such as Garten v Shearman & Sterling LLP 2013 NY Slip Op 00035
Decided on January 8, 2013 Appellate Division, First Department end up. Here, in a surprisingly clear recitation, the AD tells us why this case was doomed.…
Bankruptcy, Statutes of Limitation and Legal Malpractice
Plaintiff is injured on a cruise ship, and comes back to NY looking for an attorney. Right now we should be thinking, venue, long-arm jurisdiction, state or federal court. However, in Palmer v Mulvehill 2012 NY Slip Op 33046(U) December 19, 2012 Sup Ct, Suffolk County Docket Number: 11-17748 Judge: Daniel Martin things take off…
Most of the Thicket Cleared Away in a Legal Malpractice Case
In this legal malpractice case, many of the causes of action are now weeded out after CPLR 3211 motions. H.P.S. Mgt. Co., Inc. v St. Paul Surplus Lines Ins. Co. 2012 NY Slip Op 09028
Decided on December 26, 2012 Appellate Division, Second Department
"In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for…
Several Errors Doom this Legal Malpractice Counterclaim
A very familiar scenario in the legal malpractice world is the Attorney Fee Suit / Legal Malpractice Counterclaim. Facially, this combo is completely predictable and logically there is no shame or second-class status to the legal malpractice counterclaim. In practice, however, many courts think the counterclaim is a "last-ditch" or equivalent effort to avoid paying justified fees. …
An Imaginative Pro-Se Legal Malpractice Claim
In Rooney v Manzo 2012 NY Slip Op 32966(U) December 5, 2012 Sup Ct, Queens County
Docket Number: 5865/2012 Judge: Robert J. McDonald we see an inspired attempt to get around the 3 year statue of limitations. It does not succeed.
"In his first cause of action, plaintiff sets forth his claim that defendant breached…
Successive ? No. Successful? Yes Legal Malpractice Case Dismissed
In this legal malpractice case, defendant made motions in a seemingly out-of-order fashion, yet succeeded even though. Here is the AD discussing a novel method of moving to dismiss in Shirzadnia v Lecci 2012 NY Slip Op 09043 Decided on December 26, 2012 Appellate Division, Second Department:
"The plaintiff commenced the instant action by…
New Years and 2013
We would like to take this opportunity today to wish all a Happy New Year, with health and blessings. This past year has been tumultious and the odds are that 2013 will be exciting as well. We’re looking forward to reporting on the Legal Malpractice news and cases as time and energy swirl around us.