Reading the beginning of this case immediately brought us back to a Conflicts class at law school. We were to to analyze an auto accident in which plaintiff resided in state A and the accident took place in state B and the insurer was from state C…well you get the picture. Here in Cambridge Integrated Servs.
Legal Malpractice News
When the Real and the Hypothetical Just Don’t Mix
In Simoni v Costigan 2012 NY Slip Op 07882 Decided on November 20, 2012 Appellate Division, First Department plaintiff tries to get the ongoing personal injury action consolidated with a legal malpractice action. Plaintiff fails. We cannot tell why, from the decision, and the underlying Supreme Court decision is not available to us. In general…
Discovery and Privilege in Legal Malpractice Settings
In legal malpractice litigation there is always the "prior" or "defendant" attorney and usually a "successor" attorney. What discovery may entail between them, and what portion of the successor’s file may be disclosed? Ingram Yuzek Gainen Carroll & Bertolotti, LLP v
Coden 2012 NY Slip Op 32741(U) October 23, 2012 Supreme Court, New York…
A Pro-Se Plaintiff Strikes Out Twice in Legal Malpractice
Regular practitioners get little enough guidance in the appellate process, and reasons for dismissals and other outcomes are not always apparent or even stated. Here, in two cases a pro-se plaintiff has her case dismissed, but with almost no guidance. In Cascardo v Snitow Kanfer Holtzer & Millus, LLP 2012 NY Slip Op 07615  …
Successor Law Firms and Legal Malpractice
Attorneys skip from firm to firm, and take cases with them. Some cases hold that the former law firm remains on the hook even though the attorney left. Rosenbaum v Sheresky Aronson Mayefsky & Sloan, LLP 2012 NY Slip Op 07651 Decided on November 14, 2012 Appellate Division, Second Department does not. While…
Some High Stakes Motion Practice in a Legal Malpractice Case
Pryor Cashman is no stranger to legal malpractice cases. In today’s NYLJBrendan Pierson reports on one such case. The lawsuit, Fitzsimmons v. Pryor Cashman, 651360/10, was filed in August 2010.
"The plaintiffs are the trustees of three benefit funds for the Construction Workers Local 147, better known as the Sandhogs. The plaintiffs allege Pryor Cashman’s malpractice…
Real Estate Transactions and the Statute of Limitations
Plaintiff buys a co-op in 2002. She re-finances in 2008 using the same attorney. In 2010 she hires the same attorney to sell the unit and learns for the first time that the certificate of occupancy permits the unit to be used only as a professional office, not for residential use. Is an action for legal malpractice…
Whatever Happened to “Effectively Compelled” in Legal Malpractice
Once upon a time, the universally known and understood standard of whether a settlement (as against a dismissal or a verdict) of the underlying case affected the right to sue the attorney could be stated as "Was the settlement effectively compelled my mistakes of the attorney?" Now that bedrock principal seems to have been eroded…
Pro-Se Plaintiff Loses Legal Malpractice Case with Not Much Explanation
Pro-se litigation in legal malpractice has a poor prognosis. There are many idiosyncratic aspects to legal malpractice cases, and Pouncy v Solotaroff 2012 NY Slip Op 07381 Decided on November 8, 2012 Appellate Division, First Department is one example. What is the line between reasonable and unreasonable strategic choice?
"The IAS court properly…
No Non-Pecuniary Damages Permitted in Legal Malpractice
The field of potential legal malpractice damages is narrow, and the lines surrounding permissible damages has narrowed of late. Here, in Kodsi v Gee 2012 NY Slip Op 07417 Decided on November 8, 2012 Appellate Division, First Department we see the blanket principal that no non-pecuniary damages are permitted.
"Order, Supreme Court, New…