The law of legal malpractice is different; it is ubiquitous.  We see this theme again and again in the published cases.  In products liability law, privity was jettisoned years ago.  It remains in legal malpractice law.  In In re: HIRSCH ELECTRIC CO., INC., Debtor. ALLAN B. MENDELSOHN, as Chapter 7 Trustee of the

Plaintiff buys a house which it says was illegally constructed, and further says that since the seller worked for Oyster Bay, the town overlooked illegal construction and gave a Certificate of Occupancy.  This action, JULIE LAMOTHE and JUSTIN LAMOTHE, Plaintiffs, -against- THE TOWN OF OYSTER BAY, THE TOWN OF OYSTER BAY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING

A post-matrimonial legal malpractice case has some elements of sadness.  From the court’s decision, desperation is apparent.  Wife has divorced, and four years later still is trying to get what she believes is justice.  Attorney seems to be caught in a cycle of client dissatisfaction and litigation.

What finally emerges as the reason for the

What happens when four people get together and decide to open a restaurant?  Often enough, they are friends, and  have only the highest regard for each other.  They trust each other, and have high expectations that each is ready to get going and get the business started.  It does not always work that way.  We see, in   Battaglia

Plaintiff-.Attorney in this RICO action sues other attorneys who have brought legal malpractice cases, some against him.  Plaintiff was at one time a major player in the plaintiff’s legal malpractice world.  Now, in W. ROBERT CURTIS, Sc.D., J.D, CURTIS & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Plaintiffs-Appellants, – v – THE LAW OFFICES OF DAVID M. BUSHMAN, ESQ., DAVID M.