Here is a story from Texas about a legal malpractice [or is it?] case in which the insurer asks the court to determine that it owes no defense. The reason is not the usual "no notice’ or "fraud in the application." In this particular instance, the insurance company believes that the behavior complained of is not legal malpractice, but some other variant of uncovered wrong.
"A Kansas-based insurance company wants a declaration that it does not owe a defense to Fort Worth firm Cotten Schmidt in a separate suit filed against the firm. In Westport Insurance Corp. v. Cotten Schmidt LLP, et al., filed on Nov. 2 in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Westport Insurance Corp. alleges that a legal malpractice policy that it issued to Cotten Schmidt does not cover a suit brought by Empire Equipment International Inc. and Robert Russell on Sept. 4, 2007, in Tarrant County district court against Cotton Schmidt alleging wrongful levy, execution and sale, and conversion. Cotten Schmidt and two of the firm’s partners, Westport’s suit alleges, "are not alleged to have committed those wrongful acts in the rendition of legal services. . . . "