The politicians are in Iowa, the primaries started there, and today we report on a legal malpractice and recusal case in Iowa. Here two different strands of problems for the legal malpractice plaintiff are twisted together. One of the strands concerns the judges comment about the legal malpractice plaintiff and defendant: "one is dishonest, and I had lunch with the other."
The second strand is more technical. if a court finds that an attorney’s work was "ineffective" need the plaintiff then offer an expert to say the attorney was negligent? So, far the court says, "not yet."
See the case for details. Hanish v. Bracker