From the National Law Journal:

Legal Malpractice Cases May Surge as Economy Tanks

New York Lawyer
February 23, 2009
Reprints & Permissions

By Karen Sloan
The National Law Journal

Subscribe to The National Law Journal – 30 Days Free!

With the economy tanking, experts say the stage is set for a surge in legal malpractice lawsuits, as clients look to recoup their losses from third parties.

Insurance carriers and attorneys haven’t seen a tidal wave of legal malpractice suits yet, but they anticipate a spike later in the year and into 2010.

National insurance provider CNA Financial Corp. predicts that legal malpractice claims will be up by 5% in 2009, said Vice President Shauna Reeder, who oversees the large law firm professional liability group. CNA has already seen an increase in claims related to fee disputes, wherein a firm steps up its collection efforts only to see its client turn around and sue for legal malpractice.

"Legal malpractice is a money-driven area of the law — more so than other areas," said Andrew Lavoott Bluestone, an attorney who represents plaintiffs in legal malpractice cases and the author of the New York Attorney Malpractice Blog. "It has a very strong connection to the economic situation. In a downturn, you will see more people suing their attorneys over things like estates and divorces. Now, $200,000 is life or death."

Bluestone and others also expect legal malpractice lawsuits to crop up in connection with failed financial deals; foreclosures; fraud, such as the Madoff scandal; and bankruptcy cases.

Legal malpractice claims were on the rise even before the economy hit the skids in 2008.

A 36% hike

A recent American Bar Association (ABA) study that looked at legal malpractice claims filed between 2004 and 2007 found that the total number of claims increased by more than 36% compared to the previous three-year period. Those numbers don’t reflect the current recession, however.

"Markets go down, deals fall apart and some people look to place blame," said Stephen Novack, a partner and co-founder of Chicago-based Novack and Macey, which defends attorneys in legal malpractice cases. "Scapegoating heightens in bad economic times, and I think there will be a spike as dissatisfied investors and dealmakers look for deep pockets to try to recoup losses."

In a downturn, legal malpractice lawsuits aren’t typically filed immediately, said Brad Dantic, vice president and general counsel of ALPS Corp. in Missoula, Mont., which provides legal malpractice coverage to attorneys in 24 states. Instead, historical data suggests that increases in legal malpractice lawsuits occur in the year or two after the economy hits bottom.

"When you look at the downturn we had in 1990 and 1991, the spike in claims started in 1992 and went into 1993," he said.

For one thing, it takes time for a potential attorney error to be discovered and analyzed in advance of filing a claim, Dantic said. Additionally, plaintiffs often choose to wait until the economy has bottomed out and their losses have peaked before they attempt to recover anything through a malpractice lawsuit, he said.

"The client’s assets are going down as the economy worsens, so the extent of their damages increases during a recession," Dantic said.

Robert J. Muldoon Jr., a partner at Boston-based Sherin and Lodgen, represents attorneys in malpractices suits. Muldoon said there are two general categories of legal malpractice lawsuits generated in a down economy. One category covers claims that attorneys provided negligent legal advice in financial matters, and clients lost money or assets as a result. For example, an attorney who advised a client to invest with Bernard Madoff could potentially be sued for malpractice, Muldoon said.

The second category includes "groundless claims" filed by clients who would not sue their attorney under better economic circumstances.

"That’s kind of a dark scenario, but people might be so pressed for money that they sue," Muldoon said.

Bluestone predicts an increase in legal malpractice suits initiated by bankruptcy trustees that target attorneys who worked for the bankrupt entity. Bankruptcy trustees have a fiduciary responsibility to collect as many assets as possible to distribute to creditors, and that includes funds from a potential legal malpractice suit, Bluestone said.

CNA also is concerned about an increase in bankruptcy-related malpractice claims. "As corporate institutions begin to fail, we expect to see scrutiny from bankruptcy trustees and state-appointed receivers," Reeder said. "They will be investigating the professionals with regard to the advice they provided to their bankrupt client."

 

 

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Andrew Lavoott Bluestone

Andrew Lavoott Bluestone has been an attorney for 40 years, with a career that spans criminal prosecution, civil litigation and appellate litigation. Mr. Bluestone became an Assistant District Attorney in Kings County in 1978, entered private practice in 1984 and in 1989 opened…

Andrew Lavoott Bluestone has been an attorney for 40 years, with a career that spans criminal prosecution, civil litigation and appellate litigation. Mr. Bluestone became an Assistant District Attorney in Kings County in 1978, entered private practice in 1984 and in 1989 opened his private law office and took his first legal malpractice case.

Since 1989, Bluestone has become a leader in the New York Plaintiff’s Legal Malpractice bar, handling a wide array of plaintiff’s legal malpractice cases arising from catastrophic personal injury, contracts, patents, commercial litigation, securities, matrimonial and custody issues, medical malpractice, insurance, product liability, real estate, landlord-tenant, foreclosures and has defended attorneys in a limited number of legal malpractice cases.

Bluestone also took an academic role in field, publishing the New York Attorney Malpractice Report from 2002-2004.  He started the “New York Attorney Malpractice Blog” in 2004, where he has published more than 4500 entries.

Mr. Bluestone has written 38 scholarly peer-reviewed articles concerning legal malpractice, many in the Outside Counsel column of the New York Law Journal. He has appeared as an Expert witness in multiple legal malpractice litigations.

Mr. Bluestone is an adjunct professor of law at St. John’s University College of Law, teaching Legal Malpractice.  Mr. Bluestone has argued legal malpractice cases in the Second Circuit, in the New York State Court of Appeals, each of the four New York Appellate Divisions, in all four of  the U.S. District Courts of New York and in Supreme Courts all over the state.  He has also been admitted pro haec vice in the states of Connecticut, New Jersey and Florida and was formally admitted to the US District Court of Connecticut and to its Bankruptcy Court all for legal malpractice matters. He has been retained by U.S. Trustees in legal malpractice cases from Bankruptcy Courts, and has represented municipalities, insurance companies, hedge funds, communications companies and international manufacturing firms. Mr. Bluestone regularly lectures in CLEs on legal malpractice.

Based upon his professional experience Bluestone was named a Diplomate and was Board Certified by the American Board of Professional Liability Attorneys in 2008 in Legal Malpractice. He remains Board Certified.  He was admitted to The Best Lawyers in America from 2012-2019.  He has been featured in Who’s Who in Law since 1993.

In the last years, Mr. Bluestone has been featured for two particularly noteworthy legal malpractice cases.  The first was a settlement of an $11.9 million dollar default legal malpractice case of Yeo v. Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman which was reported in the NYLJ on August 15, 2016. Most recently, Mr. Bluestone obtained a rare plaintiff’s verdict in a legal malpractice case on behalf of the City of White Plains v. Joseph Maria, reported in the NYLJ on February 14, 2017. It was the sole legal malpractice jury verdict in the State of New York for 2017.

Bluestone has been at the forefront of the development of legal malpractice principles and has contributed case law decisions, writing and lecturing which have been recognized by his peers.  He is regularly mentioned in academic writing, and his past cases are often cited in current legal malpractice decisions. He is recognized for his ample writings on Judiciary Law § 487, a 850 year old statute deriving from England which relates to attorney deceit.