Legal Malpractice in Hollywood should come as no surprise. We’ve commented on the widespread omnipresence of legal malpractice litigation, but had no idea we would be quoting Variety on the subject. Here is their report on legal malpractice and the "9 to 5" screen, stage and trust saga as well as the cult classic Harold and Maude.
"The trust representing the late writer-director Colin Higgins has sued attorney Barry Hirsch for failing to properly represent his interests in the "9 to 5" stage musical.
Colin Higgins Prods. filed suit on Jan. 14 against Hirsch and his law firm in L.A. County Superior Court, accusing Hirsch of legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty. The trust seeks damages to be determined in a jury trial.
Among the many charges in the filing: Hirsch failed to adequately secure Higgins’ rights to a live stage show from Patricia Resnick, the original scribe for the movie, and failed to advise the trustee in 2006 that the firm was representing Resnick at the time she was writing the book for "9 to 5: The Musical."
When the trustee asked how such a musical could be mounted without stage rights from Higgins Prods., Hirsch supposedly stated, "It may not be ethical, but it is legal."
According to the suit, Higgins, best known for penning "Harold and Maude," inked his deal with Fox to rewrite Resnick’s "9 to 5" screenplay in 1979. Hirsch represented the writer-director and his shingle on various entertainment matters, including that contract.