Patent Litigators held their breath all through the summer, as the Supreme Court considered whether a patent could be enforced in the Internet process area.  Bilski v. Kapos was decided by terms end, but did not really put the issues to bed. 

Apparently, while others were holding their breath, this plaintiff/client and her attorney were starting their own litigation cycle.  As Law.Com reports dueling suits in Westchester and New York bring up the question of whether the attorneys abused plaintiff in their billing while representing her in patent litigation.

"A retired university professor who has pursued dozens of electronics companies for patent infringement on Monday filed a notice to sue her former attorneys for $10 million, accusing them of misusing escrow funds and charging her excessive fees.

Gertrude Neumark Rothschild filed a summons in Manhattan Supreme Court against Troutman Sanders; an intellectual property boutique chaired by Albert L. Jacobs Jr. before he became a partner at Troutman; and Jacobs.

Her motion comes only days after Troutman, Jacobs and the now-defunct boutique filed separate lawsuits against her in Westchester County Supreme Court for a combined $4.4 million in unpaid legal bills. Rothschild said in her court papers that she fired Troutman Sanders for cause in June.

 

Jacobs began representing Rothschild, a former Columbia physics professor, in October 2007 after arriving a few months earlier at Dreier from Greenberg Traurig, according to his boutique’s complaint. Rothschild retained him to represent her before the International Trade Commission in cases against companies importing devices using light-emitting diodes that she claimed infringed on patents she held.

Rothschild turned to Jacobs for later disputes both in the United States and abroad, his complaint said. Among those Jacobs targeted for Rothschild were Sony Corporation, Motorola Inc. and Hitachi Ltd. and 31 other companies, according to records filed in February 2008 before the U.S. International Trade Commission.

By November 2009, when Jacobs formally became a partner at Troutman Sanders, he had obtained $14 million in settlements and licensing fees for Rothschild, according to the boutique’s complaint, which said settlements and agreements came from 10 large consumer electronic companies.

Rothschild paid Albert Jacobs LLP on some of its invoices, "but has failed and refused" to pay other ones, the boutique said in its complaint. She "never expressed any dissatisfaction with the legal services" the boutique rendered, the suit claimed, but instead "commended" its efforts. "

 

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Andrew Lavoott Bluestone

Andrew Lavoott Bluestone has been an attorney for 40 years, with a career that spans criminal prosecution, civil litigation and appellate litigation. Mr. Bluestone became an Assistant District Attorney in Kings County in 1978, entered private practice in 1984 and in 1989 opened…

Andrew Lavoott Bluestone has been an attorney for 40 years, with a career that spans criminal prosecution, civil litigation and appellate litigation. Mr. Bluestone became an Assistant District Attorney in Kings County in 1978, entered private practice in 1984 and in 1989 opened his private law office and took his first legal malpractice case.

Since 1989, Bluestone has become a leader in the New York Plaintiff’s Legal Malpractice bar, handling a wide array of plaintiff’s legal malpractice cases arising from catastrophic personal injury, contracts, patents, commercial litigation, securities, matrimonial and custody issues, medical malpractice, insurance, product liability, real estate, landlord-tenant, foreclosures and has defended attorneys in a limited number of legal malpractice cases.

Bluestone also took an academic role in field, publishing the New York Attorney Malpractice Report from 2002-2004.  He started the “New York Attorney Malpractice Blog” in 2004, where he has published more than 4500 entries.

Mr. Bluestone has written 38 scholarly peer-reviewed articles concerning legal malpractice, many in the Outside Counsel column of the New York Law Journal. He has appeared as an Expert witness in multiple legal malpractice litigations.

Mr. Bluestone is an adjunct professor of law at St. John’s University College of Law, teaching Legal Malpractice.  Mr. Bluestone has argued legal malpractice cases in the Second Circuit, in the New York State Court of Appeals, each of the four New York Appellate Divisions, in all four of  the U.S. District Courts of New York and in Supreme Courts all over the state.  He has also been admitted pro haec vice in the states of Connecticut, New Jersey and Florida and was formally admitted to the US District Court of Connecticut and to its Bankruptcy Court all for legal malpractice matters. He has been retained by U.S. Trustees in legal malpractice cases from Bankruptcy Courts, and has represented municipalities, insurance companies, hedge funds, communications companies and international manufacturing firms. Mr. Bluestone regularly lectures in CLEs on legal malpractice.

Based upon his professional experience Bluestone was named a Diplomate and was Board Certified by the American Board of Professional Liability Attorneys in 2008 in Legal Malpractice. He remains Board Certified.  He was admitted to The Best Lawyers in America from 2012-2019.  He has been featured in Who’s Who in Law since 1993.

In the last years, Mr. Bluestone has been featured for two particularly noteworthy legal malpractice cases.  The first was a settlement of an $11.9 million dollar default legal malpractice case of Yeo v. Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman which was reported in the NYLJ on August 15, 2016. Most recently, Mr. Bluestone obtained a rare plaintiff’s verdict in a legal malpractice case on behalf of the City of White Plains v. Joseph Maria, reported in the NYLJ on February 14, 2017. It was the sole legal malpractice jury verdict in the State of New York for 2017.

Bluestone has been at the forefront of the development of legal malpractice principles and has contributed case law decisions, writing and lecturing which have been recognized by his peers.  He is regularly mentioned in academic writing, and his past cases are often cited in current legal malpractice decisions. He is recognized for his ample writings on Judiciary Law § 487, a 850 year old statute deriving from England which relates to attorney deceit.