The statute of limitations for professional malpractice (other than medical malpractice) is three years. What happens when further claims are added to a timely case, and defendants argue that these claims are time-barred? Hustedt Chevrolet, Inc. v Jones, Little & Co. 2015 NY Slip Op 04611 [129 AD3d 669] June 3, 2015 Appellate Division, Second
Legal Malpractice Cases
When there is Fraud in Addition to Legal Malpractice
In the distant past, breach of contract cases against attorneys carried a 6 year statute of limitations, but that all ended long ago. A claim of fraud is also due a 6 year statute of limitations and may be rewarded by treble damages. Clients often ask whether a claim can be made against the attorney…
Judiciary Law 487 and Changes Over Time
Today’s New York Law Journal has an interesting article which discusses the Pre- and Post-Amalfitano v. Rosenberg status of Judiciary Law § 487 cases. The conclusion of Herrington and Miller is that JL § 487 cases are on the rise, and courts are less willing to dismiss them at the beginning of the case. …
Drugs, Gambling and Legal Malpractice?
Kerley v Kerley 2015 NY Slip Op 06891 Decided on September 23, 2015 Appellate Division, Second Department is a tragic story. What the Court portrays as a good mom, and a troubled dad ends in divorce and financial ruin. Father blew through $1 Million and was in drug rehab, was a gambler and when it…
The “But For” Graveyard of Legal Malpractice Claims
The least understood part of legal malpractice litigation is the “but for” standard, in which Plaintiff must demonstrate that “but for” the negligence (or departure) of the attorney, plaintiff would have enjoyed a better or more economically favorable outcome. In most instances plaintiff correctly recognizes the departure, and the damages are often self-evident. This is…
Invoking Legal Malpractice as a Weapon
Attorneys who are the subject of counter-claims of legal malpractice often denigrate the quality of the counterclaim by arguing that it merely a reflexive way of not paying their bill. Sometimes they are right, which devalues the balance of well-pleaded legal malpractice claims. Sometimes the threat of a legal malpractice case has even shakier footing. …
An Attorney Fee Case Turns Into a Border War
Balestriere PLLC v Banxcorp 2014 NY Slip Op 32941(U) November 17, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 650919/10 Judge: Joan A. Madden is yet another example of how an attorney fee-dispute can morph into a much larger case, and sometimes a real problem for the attorney.
“The Firm was retained by defendants in…
First, the Attorney Must Prove It Did No Wrong
Harris Beach PLLC v Eber Bros. Wine & Liq. Corp. 2014 NYSlipOp 06704 [121 AD3d 1524]
October 3, 2014 Appellate Division, Fourth Department is an interesting case in which the Third Department briskly reversed the order of Supreme Court. Harris Beach is a large powerful upstate law firm, and it sued for close to…
A One-Two Knockout in a Legal Malpractice Case
Sometimes what appears to be a clear and convincing description of a mistake by an attorney fails to elicit approval from Supreme Court or from the Appellate Division. One reads the introduction to a decision, and it’s almost -wham- “that sounds like a real departure”. Then you read the balance of the decision, and the…
Privity and Professional Negligence
For social policy reasons, courts have severely limited the class of persons who may sue an attorney for legal malpractice. The alternative, courts have often held, is chaos. After every case, no matter who wins, the losing party will sue both attorneys. There will be two legal malpractice cases for every regular case! The same…