Gajek v Schwartzapfel, Novick, Truowski & Marcus, P.C. 2014 NY Slip Op 32418(U) September 8, 2014 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 12-2375 Judge: Ralph T. Gazzillo is an example of what we believe is the most complicated case to litigate. Last week we discussed the successor counsel problem. Today, we look to this
Legal Malpractice News
$100 Million in Personal Guarantees and a Bad Result
Did Plaintiff paint himself into a corner, when he expanded a business and took on $100 million in personal guarantees, or did his attorneys fail him later, when litigation began? That’s the question in Lichtenstein v Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP 2014 NY Slip Op 06242 Decided on September 18, 2014 Appellate Division, First Department.…
Many Technical Reasons for An Outlier Decision
It’s well understood that non-pecuniary damages are not available in legal malpractice. No damages for emotional distress, no damages for physical injury (think: heart attack) from legal malpractice and no damages for wrongful incarceration which are non-pecuniary. Nevertheless, in D’Alessandro v Carro 2014 NY Slip Op 06246 Decided on September 18, 2014 Appellate Division, First…
What Does it Take to Succeed on Summary Judgment in Legal Malpractice?
Gajek v Schwartzapfel, Novick, Truowski & Marcus, P.C. 2014 NY Slip Op 32418(U) September 8, 2014 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 12-2375 Judge: Ralph T. Gazzillo discusses the burden for both plaintiff and defendant.
For Defendant: Schwartzapfel and Platt now move for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims against Platt.
The Intersection of Medical Malpractice and Legal Malpractice
A legal malpractice case which arises from a medical malpractice case gone wrong is (we believe) just about the most complicated case to litigate. Plaintiff must first prove that there were departures from good legal representation, and then afterwards, must prove that there were departures from medical treatment which proximately caused damage. Both legal and…
Auto Injury Not Bad Enough for Legal Malpractice
Motor Vehicle injuries are often a question of whether plaintiff suffered a "serious injury" within the meaning of the insurance Law. A serious injury is defined as "death, dismbmberment, loss of an organ…" Many a hurtful non-fracture does not qualify as a "serious injury" even though it is life-changing. What does this mean for legal malpractice…
Is This a Judiciary Law 487 Case?
In today’s New York Law Journal Christine Simmons has a truly shocking article about a law firm discovering that one of its attorneys was sending false bills to the client. OK, this by itself is not so shocking, but the complaint also claims that the attorney created fake orders, forged the signature of a…
Collateral Estoppel, Attorney Fees and Legal Malpractice
Courts have found many ways to award attorney fees and force litigants to pay them. Sometimes it is on the merits and sometimes litigants are the losers on technical issues. One of the more interesting wrinkles in legal malpractice is the question of attorney fee awards and collateral estoppel of the subsequent legal malpractice case.
Urias …
Fees in Medical Malpractice Cases and Legal Malpractice
Fees in medical malpractice were lowered many years ago in hopes of curbing the "medical malpractice plague." Our view is that the AMA has found that there are an incredible number of medical malpractice mistakes, and that litigation is the only way for a damaged patient to obtain reasonable compensation.
Whether you agree with that…
Pro-Se Legal Malpractice Case Fails Its Initial Test
Plaintiff alleges that defendant "caused an action to be commenced against the plaintiff and a preclusion order to be entered against him in that action, and that they failed to assert the defenses of laches and statute of limitations in the underlying action." Unfortunately for plaintiff, the Appellate Division determined that he was unable to…