It’s well understood that non-pecuniary damages are not available in legal malpractice.  No damages for emotional distress, no damages for physical injury (think: heart attack) from legal malpractice and no damages for wrongful incarceration which are non-pecuniary.  Nevertheless, in D’Alessandro v Carro  2014 NY Slip Op 06246  Decided on September 18, 2014  Appellate Division, First

Gajek v Schwartzapfel, Novick, Truowski & Marcus,  P.C.  2014 NY Slip Op 32418(U)  September 8, 2014  Supreme Court, Suffolk County  Docket Number: 12-2375  Judge: Ralph T. Gazzillo discusses the burden for both plaintiff and defendant.

For Defendant:  Schwartzapfel and Platt now move for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims against Platt.

A legal malpractice case which arises from a medical malpractice case gone wrong is (we believe) just about the most complicated case to litigate.  Plaintiff must first prove that there were departures from good legal representation, and then afterwards, must prove that there were departures from medical treatment which proximately caused damage.  Both legal and

Motor Vehicle injuries are often a question of whether plaintiff suffered a "serious injury" within the meaning of the insurance Law.  A serious injury is defined as "death, dismbmberment, loss of an organ…"  Many a hurtful non-fracture does not qualify as a "serious injury" even though it is life-changing.  What does this mean for legal malpractice