Contrary to the general view of how cases are decided in legal malpractice, the focus is almost always on the underlying case, or the "but for" question. Pannone v Silberstein 2014 NY Slip Op 03944 Decided on June 3, 2014 Appellate Division, First Department is no exception. Was the Article 78 actually filed on
Legal Malpractice News
Long Running Patent Legal Malpractice Case Settled, Attorney a Casualty
One of the more interesting legal malpractice cases in the patent area has been the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory v. Ropes & Gray case. Cold Spring announced the settlement today which ended a cross-state litigation. It started in the Eastern District, and was transferred to Massachussets, then dismissed in US District Court, District of Massachusetts there…
Badly Pled Legal Malpractice Complaint Dismissed
Norwich, NY: It is ironic when a legal malpractice complaint is dismissed for technical reasons, and worse when it makes claims that are never compensible. Nevertheless, in Kreamer v Town of Oxford 2012 NY Slip Op 04445 [96 AD3d 1128] June 7, 2012 Appellate Division, Third Department that’s exactly what happened.
"Defendant Roger Monaco (hereinafter…
Long Intertwined Relationship leads to Death and Non-suit
Attorney represents real estate corporation, and represents it, makes loans to it, and in intimately involved for a number of years. Attorney dies. Litigation ensues.
Cohen v Gateway Bldrs. Realty, Inc. 2014 NY Slip Op 50832(U) Decided on May 27, 2014
Supreme Court, Kings County Demarest, J. is at base, a very sad story. …
It’s Almost Always the Underlying Case
UTICA: The battle in legal malpractice cases almost always centers on the question of "but for", that hypothetical comparison of the actual outcome to the ideal outcome, had there been no malpractice. Dischiavi v Calli 2013 NY Slip Op 07289 [111 AD3d 1258] November 8, 2013
Appellate Division, Fourth Department is a prime example. …
Why Do People Bother?
A criticism that arises regularly, and which seems embedded in the judiciary’s imagination is that the majority of legal malpractice cases are "sour grapes", "Monday morning quarterbacking" and "reflexive counterclaims." While we hotly dispute these terms, some cases do prove the generalization true. Liddle & Robinson, LLP v Byrne 2014 NY Slip Op 31328(U) …
They Sued the Company’s Attorney and Legal Malpractice Case is Dismissed
Client is involved in a fraudulent transaction, or even in an investment gone sour, and seeks to get the investment money back. Client looks to see who might be responsible, and attorneys are always a good target. This sometimes leads to dismissals of legal malpractice cases on standing, privity and statute of limitations.
Goldin v …
The Collateral Estoppel Trap in Legal Malpractice
A legal malpractice case is brought, and swiftly dismissed. In Cie Sharp v Krishman Chittur 2014 NY Slip Op 31303(U) May 13, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 155098/13 Judge: Joan A. Madden the reason is that the attorney was awarded a fee for the same work. The two cannot co-exist.
"In…
No Expert – No Win!
Troy: Just like Jack Hall Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v Duffy, 100 AD3d 1082, 1084 [2012]) defendant moved for summary judgment without an expert. Just like Jack Hall, the motion fails.Land Man Realty, Inc. v Faraone 2012 NY Slip Op 08218 [100 AD3d 1336] November 29, 2012
Appellate Division, Third…
Early Infighting in a Legal Malpractice Case
When parties represent themselves, a skewing of the normal motion practice is often seen. In general, motions over service of process, and whether a party may practice law in New York are rarely seen. Here, in Reem Contr. v Altschul & Altschul 2014 NY Slip Op 03638 Decided on May 20, 2014 Appellate Division…