BUFFALO:    After much litigation, this case ends with all causes of action and all counterclaims dismissed. Fee Claims as well as Legal Malpractice Claims are all out and the matter is over.

“Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action for legal malpractice alleging that defendants acted negligently while representing it in an action involving a construction dispute.

Client is injured.  Attorney is hired.  Attorney negotiates a rate of pay.  Must the attorney look to see whether the client has insurance, and if so, how hard does the attorney have to look?  Remember, if there is insurance there may be an insurance lawyer lurking and about to take over from the inquiring attorney.

ALBANY      The Court of Appeals addressed professional malpractice and duplicity.  Here we are discussing duplicitive causes of action, not deceit in the meaning of Judiciary Law § 487.

“The two questions on this appeal are whether plaintiff City of New York is an intended third-party beneficiary of the architectural services contract between plaintiff Dormitory Authority

A recurring theme in legal malpractice litigation is discovery of communications between the client and attorneys.  While the attorney-client privilege is waived in a legal malpractice setting between plaintiff-client and defendant-attorney, the question still comes up with subsequent attorneys.  Different from the attorney-client privilege is the common-interest privilege.  Saint Annes Dev. Co. v Russ  2018

Plaintiff sued under Judiciary Law § 487 and was promptly the subject of sanctions and dismissal.  Supreme Court granted both, and an appeal ensued.  In Liang v Wei Ji  2017 NY Slip Op 08361
Decided on November 29, 2017  Appellate Division, Second Department,  the Court affirmed because plaintiff had previously been enjoined from starting any