Divorce is a huge step.  It ends a marriage and brings with it seismic shock.  When (as always) this type of event is coupled with legal representation, the client will often blame the attorney for the outcome.  Sometimes this is warranted, and sometimes not.  Barrett v Goldstein 2017 NY Slip Op 30010(U) January 3, 2017

Bullock v Miller  2016 NY Slip Op 08268  Decided on December 8, 2016  Appellate Division, Third Department is a perfect example of how the “but for” portion of the legal malpractice world works, or alternatively, an example of how court tend to protect attorneys from their own mistakes.

Plaintiff demonstrates at least one statutory shortcoming

We are pleased to announce that a unique case brought by this office in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, and then appealed to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals has been certified to the New York State Court of Appeals.  Today’s New York Law Journal article by Mark Hamblett discusses

Supreme Court, Nassau County answered yes to the question.  This tragic story pits brother against brother, with the innocent and the guilty tormented alike.

From the decision in Galasso, Langione, & Botter, LLP v Galasso  2016 NY Slip Op 51308(U)
Decided on September 19, 2016  Supreme Court, Nassau County  DeStefano, J.:

“In 1993, the Firm

Sometimes short and concisely written opinions contain much information. Today, we cconclude with  Jefferson Apts., Inc. v Mauceri  2016 NY Slip Op 26230  Decided on July 25, 2016  Supreme Court, Queens County  Ritholtz, J. are simple.  An accounting firm is hired to oversee the basic accounting needs of a corporation.  Lots of money is missing.