“The first stone” analysis in this case is facinating. Legal malpractice action brought because plaintiff believed his prisioner beating municipal case was time barred. His attys did not bring the action at all. In Legal Malpractice case Judge now dismissed, saying:
“While, generally, suit must be initiated against a municipality and its agencies within one

Within the body of this legal malpractice case is a very interesting nugget. Suit against the opponent’s attorney may be permitted upon a showing of “malicious intent” even though there is no privity of representation [i.e. privity of contract.] A AD cite is given for this proposition, Poulson, 26 AD3d at 525.

Restaurant chain takes $25 a paycheck from employees for legal applications in immigration and hires law firm. Law firm fails to file papers, employees now must leave US for 10 years, being “out of status.” They sue, but only for monies taken; no hope of becoming US citizens. Question: Can they sue for legal malpractice

Legal Malpractice representation often requires examination of the retainer agreement. Here is an interesting case on the issue.

“A provision of a retainer agreement requiring a client to pay her lawyer’s costs in the event of a successful fee collection action has been voided by a Manhattan appellate court as against public policy.

Patricia Dow

Mark Twain coined the phrase, and it remains true today. “An attorney who represents himself…” Anthony Lin in the New York Law Journal tell us:

“A Manhattan Housing Court judge has sanctioned a well-known real estate lawyer who withheld maintenance on his own Park Avenue co-op for lying “repeatedly and without shame” in a 2005

Here is a legal malpractice case which ends in an award to the client, as well as a disciplinary finding against the attorney.

“Nearly six months after he drafted a client’s divorce agreement in 2001, attorney Bruce Beck knew he had made a mistake in its wording. He first realized the problem after a hearing